On Feb 1, 2008 8:56 PM, Peter Karman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wonder if something like this would make a useful Helper:
>
> sub forget {
> my $self = shift;
> my $accessor = shift or croak "need accessor name";
> $self->$accessor( undef );
> }
>
I like that a lot. I think I'
John Siracusa wrote on 2/1/08 4:50 PM:
> On Feb 1, 2008 4:49 PM, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But without the reload subscribed_lists() keeps returning the old list. Is
>> there a way to tip off Rose that any cached lists for a particular
>> relationship are stale? Or something I'm
On Feb 1, 2008 5:50 PM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To make an object forget a previously fetched set, just set it to undef:
Cool, that works for me. Thanks!
-sam
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microso
On Feb 1, 2008 4:49 PM, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But without the reload subscribed_lists() keeps returning the old list. Is
> there a way to tip off Rose that any cached lists for a particular
> relationship are stale? Or something I'm doing wrong?
All get_set* relationship access
Hello all. I'm working on modeling a many-to-many relationship with some
meta-data stored in the map table. Here's the relationship definition:
$meta->relationship(subscribed_lists => {
type => 'many to many',
