On Dec 12, 2007 10:14 AM, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The basic idea (safe repeated auto-generation with all customizations
> stored elsewhere) has been done several different ways in RDBO by
> others, and I've been meaning to formalize at least one way to do it.
> But I don't think
On Dec 12, 2007 10:31 AM, Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW I'd use POD markup to separate custom code from auto-generated
> code. It's safe, has markup properties, and can contain a comment about
> its purpose.
I'm more inclined to use separate .pm files, if only to keep version
con
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:14:27 -0500 "John Siracusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JS> The basic idea (safe repeated auto-generation with all
JS> customizations stored elsewhere) has been done several different
JS> ways in RDBO by others, and I've been meaning to formalize at least
JS> one way to do i
On Dec 12, 2007 8:45 AM, Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I played with the Cayenne Java ORM last week. I didn't like it much
> (it's very inferior to RDBO, especially in auto-generating from the
> schema), but one idea that caught my eye was the 'auto' hierarchy.
> Basically you get a hi
I played with the Cayenne Java ORM last week. I didn't like it much
(it's very inferior to RDBO, especially in auto-generating from the
schema), but one idea that caught my eye was the 'auto' hierarchy.
Basically you get a hierarchy like this (naming simplified):
cayenne.BaseObject
parent of
