Dear Juston,
Yes, the tutorial does explain it, after all and now I understand. Sorry, I
missed it when looking before.
cheers,
James.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin
Ellison
Sent: 31 January 2008 14:12
To: Rose::DB::Object list
On Feb 1, 2008 3:37 PM, Justin Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just tinkering with the loader, and might have found a bug.
This should be fixed in SVN now. It was actually a method-maker bug,
not a Loader bug. The Loader just happened to trigger it. Try it and
let me know. I'll
On Feb 1, 2008 4:49 PM, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But without the reload subscribed_lists() keeps returning the old list. Is
there a way to tip off Rose that any cached lists for a particular
relationship are stale? Or something I'm doing wrong?
All get_set* relationship accessors
This is mostly a Perl question, I suspect.
I have a Rose::Object that represents a collection of files. Call it
a Collection. Now, one of the attributes of a Collection is an
array called files. That array holds info about individual files as
Collection::File objects.
First, a
On Feb 1, 2008 5:50 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To make an object forget a previously fetched set, just set it to undef:
Cool, that works for me. Thanks!
-sam
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
John Siracusa wrote on 2/1/08 4:50 PM:
On Feb 1, 2008 4:49 PM, Sam Tregar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But without the reload subscribed_lists() keeps returning the old list. Is
there a way to tip off Rose that any cached lists for a particular
relationship are stale? Or something I'm doing
On Feb 1, 2008 3:32 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should be fixed in SVN now. It was actually a method-maker bug,
not a Loader bug. The Loader just happened to trigger it. Try it and
let me know. I'll probably send this fix out as 0.7663 if it works
for you.
That did the
