Thanks, in turn I'll post the same the next time I build all.
Larry
On Sunday 06 July 2003 00:21, Silvan wrote:
> BTW, Larry, we were talking about build times. I did a distclean/make
> cycle as insurance against any lingering libjack version switch problems,
> and I remembered to time it this t
BTW, Larry, we were talking about build times. I did a distclean/make cycle
as insurance against any lingering libjack version switch problems, and I
remembered to time it this time.
My build environment variables:
export KDEDIR=/usr
export KDE_DEBUG=1
export CXXFLAGS='-g3 -O0 -gstabs+3'
ulimi
On Saturday 05 July 2003 15:11, Silvan wrote:
> In Cakewalk, I just had to filter out everything except the channel I
> wanted, but Rosegarden uses a one track, one channel model, so it
> just takes the extra channel 3 events and lumps them in together. I
> don't think there's any distinguishing c
On Saturday 05 July 2003 06:01, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 22:11:06 -0400
>
> Larry Troxler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 July 2003 03:43, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > > Aren't we cool? :-)
> >
> > I don't know. That depends on what the fluck "BEAST
On Saturday 05 July 2003 3:32 pm, Silvan wrote:
> I have to also say the damn thing has been working splendidly.
Well as I said the other week, 0.9.1 with a couple of tweaks is a
pretty tasty piece of kit (audio aside). I'm reasonably confident
that MIDI wise at least we can wrap this thing up
On Saturday 05 July 2003 3:11 pm, Silvan wrote:
> Incidentally, with one segment set to loop via this marker/loop
> mechanism vs. the same segment set to repeat, there's a very obvious
> difference. In the latter case, I can't hear the break at all, but
> in the former, it feels like there's a mi
On Saturday 05 July 2003 05:02 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> Sound like a plan? This will break MIDI merging in the short term
> but provide us with a more flexible merge facility for the future and
> simplify the document loading stuff no end.
AFAIK it's been broken for ages anyway, so go ahead and
On Saturday 05 July 2003 03:25 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> I'm currently working on markers to make this all a bit more
> obvious.
Incidentally, with one segment set to loop via this marker/loop mechanism vs.
the same segment set to repeat, there's a very obvious difference. In the
latter case,
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 22:11:06 -0400
Larry Troxler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2003 03:43, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > Aren't we cool? :-)
>
> I don't know. That depends on what the fluck "BEAST" means. No
> doubt it's something cool and happening, since it spells o
I'm just playing about with the final stage of seperating out the
loadDocument stuff from the setDocument stuff - this will enable
us to keep multiple docs in memory and switch between these buffers.
The RG file case is pretty trivial and I've got that working (but
not committed) - the MIDI/RG21 i
10 matches
Mail list logo
