[Rosegarden-devel] stuck GUI

2003-07-08 Thread Silvan
Has anyone else noticed a stuck GUI? It always seems to happen when I've started from the little icon instead of from a command line, so I've neither been able to trace this nor to have a look at the output when it happens. My far-out guess is that it's the autosave code, because none of the fi

[Rosegarden-devel] controllers

2003-07-08 Thread Silvan
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 12:22 pm, Richard Bown wrote: > > Most of the above: > > Oh yes. Fixed in ControlParameter.h. Ah. I didn't look at the header. Oh well. Glad you fixed it. Anyway, time for the argument. I think you should seriously consider changing the infrastructure a bit to permi

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] jack and fluidsynth and bugs and WTF...

2003-07-08 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 01:40, Bob Ham wrote: > On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 21:27, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > > Did you connected fluidsynth ports with some pcm output ports? > > Are you using LADCCA? It can do that for you when fluid starts. > > O_o > > Unless there's a bug, LADCCA won't connect an

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Bown
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 4:57 pm, Silvan wrote: > > > "name" "description" 0 0 127 0 0 > > > > Where? On the screen? In the RG file? Before you edit it, after > > you edit it? > > Most of the above: Oh yes. Fixed in ControlParameter.h. R

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Silvan
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 11:38 am, Richard Bown wrote: > I don't really think so - we've already got a request for you > for "loading studio from RG file" so why not just make this an > option of that? I don't like the notion of lots of file types > which are just subsets of each other - I didn't

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Silvan
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 11:35 am, Richard Bown wrote: > > BTW, something out of whack. I keep ending up with entries like > > > > "name" "description" 0 0 127 0 0 > > Where? On the screen? In the RG file? Before you edit it, after > you edit it? Most of the above: -- Michael McIntyre

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Bown
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 3:49 pm, Silvan wrote: > There should probably be a new .rgc filetype so these can be > imported/exported in the same fashion as program changes. I don't really think so - we've already got a request for you for "loading studio from RG file" so why not just make this an op

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Bown
> BTW, something out of whack. I keep ending up with entries like > > "name" "description" 0 0 127 0 0 Where? On the screen? In the RG file? Before you edit it, after you edit it? R --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Silvan
BTW, something out of whack. I keep ending up with entries like "name" "description" 0 0 127 0 0 It's not jumping out at me exactly what's going wrong here, and I'll need more time to find it. Let me know if you already found it and fixed it. :) -- Michael McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL P

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Silvan
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 03:08 am, Richard Bown wrote: > yet as Chris and I were discussing yesterday. A good next stage would > be to modify the autoload.rg to have some sensible defaults for the > ControlParameters. Already working on it, as part of trying out your new dialog. If nobody else h

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Update on property rulers

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Bown
On Monday 07 July 2003 11:29 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > I'm taking a look at the ControlParameter class and Studio which > apparently uses it, but I'm not sure I understand how these are > supposed to be edited. The ControlParameters aren't part of any > track, are they ? Nope, there's a new