Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 2

2004-03-21 Thread Silvan
On Sunday 21 March 2004 12:07 pm, William wrote: > reproduce it reliably. Anyway, since it's very rare it's probably not > a significant problem, assuming it hasn't been fixed (I don't recall > anybody having said it's been fixed on rg-devel or in changelogs). Sometimes rare and difficult to prod

[Rosegarden-devel] mixer?

2004-03-21 Thread Silvan
I've heard traffic about a new mixer console. I can't figure out where it is. Is this something that only makes itself available if Jack is running? -- Michael McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/

[Rosegarden-devel] Bug? RG silently discards MIDI MetaMarkers-lyric events

2004-03-21 Thread William
Further to my email describing a detailed RG test example (Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), it seems RG will load any MIDI file, which contains what I think are termed "MetaMarker" (or "lyric") MIDI events, such as the MIDI file I gave in my example, but when it loads the file RG will silently dis

Re: canvas retune() (was Re: [Rosegarden-devel] segmentcanvas_rework branch)

2004-03-21 Thread Guillaume Laurent
On Sunday 21 March 2004 18:43, Richard Bown wrote: > On Friday 19 March 2004 23:44, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > BTW, just out of curiosity I tried retuning the canvas. Seems that with a > > chunk size of 64 or, even better, 128, the zoom is much more responsive. > > Memory usage seems much dimishe

Re: canvas retune() (was Re: [Rosegarden-devel] segmentcanvas_rework branch)

2004-03-21 Thread Richard Bown
On Friday 19 March 2004 23:44, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > BTW, just out of curiosity I tried retuning the canvas. Seems that with a > chunk size of 64 or, even better, 128, the zoom is much more responsive. Memory usage seems much dimished too so that's good news - but it's still very slow to ref

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 2

2004-03-21 Thread William
Larry Battraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >William wrote: >> I wonder if there's a connection between this bug and the endless >> to-and-fro scrolling bug I reported on rosegarden-devel in Dec 2003. >> https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3572029&forum_id=271 > > I don't know; it

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 2

2004-03-21 Thread Larry Battraw
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 09:44, William wrote: > Larry Battraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Another small bug... Start RG and load a song. Press play then > >stop. Bring up the notation editor and try dragging the horizontal > >scroll bar; it flashes back and forth repetitively and it won't

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 2

2004-03-21 Thread William
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/tmp/rosegarden-4-0.9.7-rc2.tar.bz2 > >Again, please test. I just noticed the mod times for many of the files in rc2 are different from the mod times of the same files in rc1 yet the contents of many of the mod-time-changed f

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 2

2004-03-21 Thread William
Larry Battraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another small bug... Start RG and load a song. Press play then >stop. Bring up the notation editor and try dragging the horizontal >scroll bar; it flashes back and forth repetitively and it won't allow >you to scroll at all (always goes back to your