[Rosegarden-devel] default device labels

2004-03-23 Thread Richard Bown
The thing that's confusing me right now is that I'm sure that when the GUI came up before with no MIDI outputs enabled that the MIDI devices would have labels or similar. Now we have a default studio with 4 unconnected MIDI devices (two externals and two software devices) on and my first inst

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] settings amnesia, my turn ?

2004-03-23 Thread Richard Bown
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 23:37, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > The 'show transport' setting won't save itself. Am I the only one seeing > this ? May be I'll finally be able to track this one :-). Well hooray for that. R --- This SF.Net email is s

[Rosegarden-devel] Hullo. Quick question.

2004-03-23 Thread Dan Ostrowski
My brother does a lot of composition. Obsessively. He's a Musicology Master's student and publishes much of his composition work online at http://jeff.ostrowski.cc I am a programmer ( in school at the moment, but also doing contractual web work on the side ) and being in the same attic with him

Re: pausing, was Re: configue dialog crash (was Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 1)

2004-03-23 Thread Larry Battraw
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 18:35, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Saturday 20 March 2004 20:18, Chris Cannam wrote: > > On Saturday 20 Mar 2004 4:04 pm, Larry Battraw wrote: > > > On an unrelated note, it > > > appears that it's not possible to rewind/ff the transport while the > > > song is paused. Is t

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 3

2004-03-23 Thread Silvan
On Monday 22 March 2004 11:53 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Monday 22 Mar 2004 4:30 pm, William wrote: > > Does rc3 support the import of MIDI marker events as per the devel > > CVS commit you announced earlier today? > > Yes. I probably shouldn't have done that in this RC phase, but I did. You DA

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] mixer?

2004-03-23 Thread Silvan
On Monday 22 March 2004 04:47 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > Yes. It's an audio mixer only -- doesn't yet contain MIDI level > faders, although it will. It's the first item on the Studio menu if > you've reinstalled recently enough (last couple of months). I just missed it. See it now. Well, I gue

[Rosegarden-devel] reason to bitch about new transport behavior...

2004-03-23 Thread Silvan
You said you'd leave it and wait until someone complained... Well, here it is... I've got KMail on this desktop, maximized. I started up RG to have a quick look. I then minimized it. It left its transport on top of KMail, even after KMail had the focus. I couldn't get rid of it save by min

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Track editor: Delete versus Delete Tracks

2004-03-23 Thread Silvan
On Monday 22 March 2004 09:36 am, Richard Bown wrote: > In this case there are several "intuitives" all piling up on top of each > other and we have to cater to all of them. It's all fine IMHO, FWIW. > > 3 The "Erase" tool on the toolbar which will erase any segment you click > >on regardle

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] settings amnesia, my turn ?

2004-03-23 Thread Silvan
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 06:37 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > The 'show transport' setting won't save itself. Am I the only one seeing > this ? May be I'll finally be able to track this one :-). I'm having problems with the flap on the tranport losing its state. The transport itself seems fine.

[Rosegarden-devel] settings amnesia, my turn ?

2004-03-23 Thread Guillaume Laurent
The 'show transport' setting won't save itself. Am I the only one seeing this ? May be I'll finally be able to track this one :-). -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org ---

Re: pausing, was Re: configue dialog crash (was Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 1)

2004-03-23 Thread Guillaume Laurent
On Saturday 20 March 2004 20:18, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Saturday 20 Mar 2004 4:04 pm, Larry Battraw wrote: > > On an unrelated note, it > > appears that it's not possible to rewind/ff the transport while the > > song is paused. Is this intentional? > > So it is. I hadn't noticed -- I never use

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Guillaume Laurent
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 16:41, William wrote: > If anyone would know a lot about MIDI, it's not surprisingly a RG author :) Bwahaha. That reminds me of that time way back when we were first discussing the post-2.1 RG rewrite, and we discovered none of us had a sound card. Which makes me think t

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 4:08 pm, Richard Bown wrote: > On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:41, William wrote: > > If anyone would know a lot about MIDI, it's not surprisingly a RG > > author :) > > You'd be surprised. Indeed, I fear we've all mostly learned by osmosis, or from a selection of other unoffic

[Rosegarden-devel] Adding bug reports and feature requests to trackers tomorrow

2004-03-23 Thread William
I've decided to post my list of bug reports and feature requests on the sf trackers tomorrow so as to give me time to review them again. My 56/33 kpbs link is going offline now. Repeat after me: "it feels fast". William --- This SF.Net email i

[Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 4

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
Contains fixes to the odd crashing bug plus the MIDI import composition duration scandal. http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/tmp/rosegarden-4-0.9.7-rc4.tar.bz2 http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/tmp/rosegarden-4-0.9.7-rc3rc4.patch.bz2 Chris --- Th

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Richard Bown
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:41, William wrote: > If anyone would know a lot about MIDI, it's not surprisingly a RG author :) You'd be surprised. The specs are long and boring and the special cases (and sometimes just the simple ones in my case) take an eon to understand. I'd say it's much more

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread William
Chris Cannam wrote: > >William wrote: >> having added support for MIDI marker events does RG now have >> complete support for all possible MIDI event types in MIDI files? > >No, but again it's not quite as simple as all that. Is there a summary or file somewhere that lists which MIDI event types R

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 2:51 pm, William wrote: > I see. Thanks for explaining that so clearly. My final question > here is: having added support for MIDI marker events does RG now > have complete support for all possible MIDI event types in MIDI > files? No, but again it's not quite as simple as

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread William
Chris Cannam wrote: > >No. MIDI events have no duration, only start time -- the duration of >a note is defined by the gap between the separate note on and note >off events. But when reading from a MIDI file, we were reading the >events into an object type that does store durations: for notes w

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 1:56 pm, William wrote: > So, out of curiosity, to what durations do events other than note > events get initialised now? Zero. > Does every possible MIDI event type > always have a duration specified when that event occurs in a MIDI > file, the duration being what you are

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread William
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[...] >yes, if you have the energy. >Please make sure you're logged in to a SourceForge account first, I do and, yes, I will do. >[re rc4 or rc3-rc4.patch.bz2 ] > >I'll do that shortly. Thanks. >Turns out no, it isn't anything more subtle -- it's a failu

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 12:57 pm, William wrote: > Ok. Repeating my earlier question, shall I also log the 20-30(?) > bug reports and feature requests which I emailed to rg-devel in > 12.2003 and my followups in 3.2004? Sorry I didn't realise that was a question. Then yes, if you have the energy

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread William
Chris Cannam wrote: > >William wrote: >> Is there a feature request for this on the sf tracker? >> If not, may I enter one, please? > >I can't see one. Feel free. Ok. Repeating my earlier question, shall I also log the 20-30(?) bug reports and feature requests which I emailed to rg-devel in 12.2

[Rosegarden-devel] Re: [Rosegarden-user] soundes architectures cogito

2004-03-23 Thread William
Chris Cannam wrote: >I wasn't aware they did here either, on ADSL. Some do, some don't. BT OpenWorld, Freeserve and Easynet each seem to have monthly usage caps around 120 hours or 10GB, whichever is reached first. Various grumblers: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Ope

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Track editor: Delete versus Delete Tracks

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 22 Mar 2004 7:37 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Monday 22 March 2004 17:25, William wrote: > > If you've the time to implement it a "Delete All Empty Tracks" in > > the Edit menu would save quite a bit of mouse-work on some files. > > That's a good idea... Can you add a feature request

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Bug? Play continues beyond end of the longest segment

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 22 Mar 2004 2:36 pm, William wrote: > Is there a feature request for this on the sf tracker? > If not, may I enter one, please? I can't see one. Feel free. > >> because the composition duration is 5522 bars (how that > >> came about I do not know). > > > >Now _that_ is a very real bug

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] crash in SegmentMmapper

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 22 Mar 2004 9:47 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > I have a repeatable crash when merging one particular Rosegarden > file into another. Found and fixed -- the assignments of track IDs in RosegardenGUIDoc::mergeDocument were completely wrong where the source document had more than one segment

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] release candidate 2

2004-03-23 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 1:01 am, Larry Battraw wrote: > Yep, you're right-- it's paused. It's still rather odd behavior. > I've never had a software package prohibit me from scrolling before > and I'm sure it would confuse others. Perhaps make it an option? Nah, I reckon it's simply a bug, just