The thing that's confusing me right now is that I'm sure that when the GUI
came up before with no MIDI outputs enabled that the MIDI devices would have
labels or similar. Now we have a default studio with 4
unconnected MIDI devices (two externals and two software devices) on and my
first inst
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 23:37, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> The 'show transport' setting won't save itself. Am I the only one seeing
> this ? May be I'll finally be able to track this one :-).
Well hooray for that.
R
---
This SF.Net email is s
My brother does a lot of composition. Obsessively. He's a Musicology Master's
student and publishes much of his composition work online at
http://jeff.ostrowski.cc
I am a programmer ( in school at the moment, but also doing contractual web
work on the side ) and being in the same attic with him
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 18:35, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Saturday 20 March 2004 20:18, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 Mar 2004 4:04 pm, Larry Battraw wrote:
> > > On an unrelated note, it
> > > appears that it's not possible to rewind/ff the transport while the
> > > song is paused. Is t
On Monday 22 March 2004 11:53 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 22 Mar 2004 4:30 pm, William wrote:
> > Does rc3 support the import of MIDI marker events as per the devel
> > CVS commit you announced earlier today?
>
> Yes. I probably shouldn't have done that in this RC phase, but I did.
You DA
On Monday 22 March 2004 04:47 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Yes. It's an audio mixer only -- doesn't yet contain MIDI level
> faders, although it will. It's the first item on the Studio menu if
> you've reinstalled recently enough (last couple of months).
I just missed it. See it now. Well, I gue
You said you'd leave it and wait until someone complained... Well, here it
is...
I've got KMail on this desktop, maximized. I started up RG to have a quick
look. I then minimized it. It left its transport on top of KMail, even
after KMail had the focus. I couldn't get rid of it save by min
On Monday 22 March 2004 09:36 am, Richard Bown wrote:
> In this case there are several "intuitives" all piling up on top of each
> other and we have to cater to all of them.
It's all fine IMHO, FWIW.
> > 3 The "Erase" tool on the toolbar which will erase any segment you click
> >on regardle
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 06:37 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> The 'show transport' setting won't save itself. Am I the only one seeing
> this ? May be I'll finally be able to track this one :-).
I'm having problems with the flap on the tranport losing its state. The
transport itself seems fine.
The 'show transport' setting won't save itself. Am I the only one seeing
this ? May be I'll finally be able to track this one :-).
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
---
On Saturday 20 March 2004 20:18, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Saturday 20 Mar 2004 4:04 pm, Larry Battraw wrote:
> > On an unrelated note, it
> > appears that it's not possible to rewind/ff the transport while the
> > song is paused. Is this intentional?
>
> So it is. I hadn't noticed -- I never use
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 16:41, William wrote:
> If anyone would know a lot about MIDI, it's not surprisingly a RG author :)
Bwahaha. That reminds me of that time way back when we were first discussing
the post-2.1 RG rewrite, and we discovered none of us had a sound card.
Which makes me think t
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 4:08 pm, Richard Bown wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:41, William wrote:
> > If anyone would know a lot about MIDI, it's not surprisingly a RG
> > author :)
>
> You'd be surprised.
Indeed, I fear we've all mostly learned by osmosis, or from a
selection of other unoffic
I've decided to post my list of bug reports and feature requests
on the sf trackers tomorrow so as to give me time to review them again.
My 56/33 kpbs link is going offline now. Repeat after me: "it feels fast".
William
---
This SF.Net email i
Contains fixes to the odd crashing bug plus the MIDI import
composition duration scandal.
http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/tmp/rosegarden-4-0.9.7-rc4.tar.bz2
http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/tmp/rosegarden-4-0.9.7-rc3rc4.patch.bz2
Chris
---
Th
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:41, William wrote:
> If anyone would know a lot about MIDI, it's not surprisingly a RG author :)
You'd be surprised.
The specs are long and boring and the special cases (and sometimes just the
simple ones in my case) take an eon to understand. I'd say it's much more
Chris Cannam wrote:
>
>William wrote:
>> having added support for MIDI marker events does RG now have
>> complete support for all possible MIDI event types in MIDI files?
>
>No, but again it's not quite as simple as all that.
Is there a summary or file somewhere that lists which MIDI event types
R
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 2:51 pm, William wrote:
> I see. Thanks for explaining that so clearly. My final question
> here is: having added support for MIDI marker events does RG now
> have complete support for all possible MIDI event types in MIDI
> files?
No, but again it's not quite as simple as
Chris Cannam wrote:
>
>No. MIDI events have no duration, only start time -- the duration of
>a note is defined by the gap between the separate note on and note
>off events. But when reading from a MIDI file, we were reading the
>events into an object type that does store durations: for notes w
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 1:56 pm, William wrote:
> So, out of curiosity, to what durations do events other than note
> events get initialised now?
Zero.
> Does every possible MIDI event type
> always have a duration specified when that event occurs in a MIDI
> file, the duration being what you are
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
>yes, if you have the energy.
>Please make sure you're logged in to a SourceForge account first,
I do and, yes, I will do.
>[re rc4 or rc3-rc4.patch.bz2 ]
>
>I'll do that shortly.
Thanks.
>Turns out no, it isn't anything more subtle -- it's a failu
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 12:57 pm, William wrote:
> Ok. Repeating my earlier question, shall I also log the 20-30(?)
> bug reports and feature requests which I emailed to rg-devel in
> 12.2003 and my followups in 3.2004?
Sorry I didn't realise that was a question. Then yes, if you have the
energy
Chris Cannam wrote:
>
>William wrote:
>> Is there a feature request for this on the sf tracker?
>> If not, may I enter one, please?
>
>I can't see one. Feel free.
Ok. Repeating my earlier question, shall I also log the 20-30(?) bug reports
and feature requests which I emailed to rg-devel in 12.2
Chris Cannam wrote:
>I wasn't aware they did here either, on ADSL.
Some do, some don't. BT OpenWorld, Freeserve and Easynet each seem to have
monthly usage caps around 120 hours or 10GB, whichever is reached first.
Various grumblers:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Ope
On Monday 22 Mar 2004 7:37 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2004 17:25, William wrote:
> > If you've the time to implement it a "Delete All Empty Tracks" in
> > the Edit menu would save quite a bit of mouse-work on some files.
>
> That's a good idea... Can you add a feature request
On Monday 22 Mar 2004 2:36 pm, William wrote:
> Is there a feature request for this on the sf tracker?
> If not, may I enter one, please?
I can't see one. Feel free.
> >> because the composition duration is 5522 bars (how that
> >> came about I do not know).
> >
> >Now _that_ is a very real bug
On Monday 22 Mar 2004 9:47 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> I have a repeatable crash when merging one particular Rosegarden
> file into another.
Found and fixed -- the assignments of track IDs in
RosegardenGUIDoc::mergeDocument were completely wrong where the
source document had more than one segment
On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 1:01 am, Larry Battraw wrote:
> Yep, you're right-- it's paused. It's still rather odd behavior.
> I've never had a software package prohibit me from scrolling before
> and I'm sure it would confuse others. Perhaps make it an option?
Nah, I reckon it's simply a bug, just
28 matches
Mail list logo