Re: [Rosegarden-devel] sforge mail issues, again...

2006-05-16 Thread Heikki Johannes Junes
2006/5/15, Guillaume Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Monday 15 May 2006 22:51, Yves Guillemot wrote: > On Monday 15 May 2006 20:34, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > Seems that mails sent to this list aren't being propagated, I posted > > something on saturday regarding KDE 3.1 support and it's still

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] sforge mail issues, again...

2006-05-16 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 15 May 2006 21:51, Yves Guillemot wrote: > The traffic seems quite low on RG lists, nevertheless I received this > two mails. Ah -- earlier I said I hadn't received this one, but it's just arrived. I wonder when Guillaume's post from Saturday will turn up? Chris

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] sforge mail issues, again...

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Monday, 15 May 2006 22:44, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Monday 15 May 2006 22:51, Yves Guillemot wrote: > > On Monday 15 May 2006 20:34, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > > Seems that mails sent to this list aren't being propagated, I posted > > > something on saturday regarding KDE 3.1 support and

[Rosegarden-devel] Re: Rosegarden translation

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Friday, 12 May 2006 19:39, Erik Magnus Johansson wrote: > Attached is the latest revision of sv.po. The "_n:" you reminded me to > enter in the msgstr's did then show in the Rosegarden GUI, so I deleted > them to get a better look: e.g. "1 händelse markerad" (1 event selected) > instead of "_n:

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] do we still support KDE 3.1 ?

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Tuesday, 16 May 2006 17:31, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > On Saturday 13 May 2006 5:00 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > I don't think so, actually I don't think we even build on 3.1, so I was > > thinking of getting rid of the kde32_* classes. Any objections ? > > Your missing message ju

[Rosegarden-devel] sforge mail issues, again...

2006-05-16 Thread Guillaume Laurent
Seems that mails sent to this list aren't being propagated, I posted something on saturday regarding KDE 3.1 support and it's still not in the archives, nor have I received the echo. I wonder if this one will actually get through :-(. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org --

[Rosegarden-devel] Translators news

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
Hi all, I've fixed recently some i18n issues reported by our Swedish translator in both development and stable_1_2_4 branches. The fixes include: 1. Enable translations for these English strings: notationviewslots.cpp: "Ornament track %1 bar %1" "Ornament bar %1" notefontviewer.c

[Rosegarden-devel] Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7265] trunk/rosegarden/gui

2006-05-16 Thread Heikki Johannes Junes
2006/5/16, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Monday 15 May 2006 3:24 am, you wrote: > Thanks. Who is currently developing Rosegarden's notation engine? At the moment, I think it's fair to say nobody is currently developing it at all. It's Chris's corner of the code more than

[Rosegarden-devel] Re: Translators news

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
Hi translators, The translation template (rosegarden.pot) has been updated, and merged all the translated message files (*.po), in both the development branch (revision #7269) and stable_1_2_4 branch (revision #7270). I've closed the bug report #1480689 (i18n issues reported by Eric Magnus Joha

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7265] trunk/rosegarden/gui

2006-05-16 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 19:28, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > I'm interested on multitrack MIDI recording, too. You're welcome to implement it if you like! > Oh, don't worry. If we seriously break something, you still will > receive the resulting flames from angry users ;-) You say that, but act

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7265] trunk/rosegarden/gui

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
I'm sending this message with CC for every quoted participant, because the problems detected with the mailing list. On Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:19, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 13:12, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > > 2006/5/16, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: Rosegarden translation

2006-05-16 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Friday 12 May 2006 7:17 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > > > The icon for Notation in the dialog window Configure Rosegarden should > > > from my point of view be changed to something else than the present > > > "Aa"; perhaps a group of two eight-notes. > > > > I agree. Perhaps the graphics

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: [osol-discuss] Sequencers/music editors on Opensolaris

2006-05-16 Thread Sergio
Le mar 16/05/2006 à 17:45, Guillaume Laurent a écrit : Sergio wrote: > > In the fact, i'm certainly not the only one musician as Solaris user Actually, it wouldn't surprise me if you were. Musicians who also are linux users are already pretty rare (they may look numerous from the rg-devel p

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: Translators news

2006-05-16 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 5/15/06, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: Development branch (trunk): Old: 1924 messages New: 1973 messages Stable branch (stable_1_2_4): Old: 1901 messages New: 1944 messages Sounds like some extra work for the next weekend :) Alexandre

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: [osol-discuss] Sequencers/music editors on Opensolaris

2006-05-16 Thread Guillaume Laurent
Sergio wrote: In the fact, i'm certainly not the only one musician as Solaris user Actually, it wouldn't surprise me if you were. Musicians who also are linux users are already pretty rare (they may look numerous from the rg-devel point of view, but that's just because they all gather here),

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Re: Rosegarden translation

2006-05-16 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Friday 12 May 2006 7:17 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > > The icon for Notation in the dialog window Configure Rosegarden should > > from my point of view be changed to something else than the present "Aa"; > > perhaps a group of two eight-notes. > > I agree. Perhaps the graphics art team c

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] do we still support KDE 3.1 ?

2006-05-16 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Saturday 13 May 2006 5:00 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > I don't think so, actually I don't think we even build on 3.1, so I was > thinking of getting rid of the kde32_* classes. Any objections ? Your missing message just arrived. No objection from me, but then you wouldn't have been expecting

[Rosegarden-devel] do we still support KDE 3.1 ?

2006-05-16 Thread Guillaume Laurent
I don't think so, actually I don't think we even build on 3.1, so I was thinking of getting rid of the kde32_* classes. Any objections ? -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web ser

[Rosegarden-devel] Re: [osol-discuss] Sequencers/music editors on Opensolaris

2006-05-16 Thread Sergio
Le dim 14/05/2006 à 02:37, Kaiwai Gardiner a écrit : On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 16:08 -0700, Serge wrote: > Hi all, > > It appears that most musical apps on Unix requires ALSA. > > I know, the Sun audio0 API is itself very nice, other hand ALSA is Linux, but how to compose music (with Rosegarden,

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] msgfmt: too many errors, aborting scons: *** [po/ru.gmo] Error 1

2006-05-16 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Monday, 8 May 2006 22:41, Vladimir Savić wrote: > Don't know what happened. Only thing I'm sure I started seeing this when > Pedro did something to messages.sh and friends. Here's the shell output: I've changed the script "messages.sh" one week ago, but I've not ran it until yesterday, when c

[Rosegarden-devel] Re: [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7265] trunk/rosegarden/gui

2006-05-16 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 13:12, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > 2006/5/16, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > At the moment, I think it's fair to say nobody is currently > > developing it at all. It's Chris's corner of the code more than > > any other part of Rosegarden, but he's

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] sforge mail issues, again...

2006-05-16 Thread Yves Guillemot
On Monday 15 May 2006 20:34, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > Seems that mails sent to this list aren't being propagated, I posted > something on saturday regarding KDE 3.1 support and it's still not in the > archives, nor have I received the echo. I wonder if this one will actually > get through :-(. T

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] sforge mail issues, again...

2006-05-16 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 15 May 2006 21:44, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Monday 15 May 2006 22:51, Yves Guillemot wrote: > > On Monday 15 May 2006 20:34, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > > Seems that mails sent to this list aren't being propagated, I > > > posted something on saturday regarding KDE 3.1 support and i