On Monday 26 June 2006 03:34 am, Vince Negri wrote:
> somewhere. It looks like we (Michelle and I primarily, but of course
> everyone is invited :) should start hammering out the API between your
> stuff and mine.
>
> > Whenever the tuning changes, the tablature gets regenerated.
>
> When using my
On Sunday 25 June 2006 22:35, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
> As to the question of why exceptions are turned off in Qt, I have come
> across a couple of stories; one being that it was because exceptions
> weren't originally portable, and the other being that exceptions
> bloated the size of KDE/Qt appl
On Sunday 25 June 2006 00:08, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
> Okay, its clear that I am in a minority of one here. So now that I
> know the development philosophy behind Rosegarden, I will follow
> it. For the record, before I shut up, the reason that I brought this
> up, is because I personally have tw
On Monday 26 Jun 2006 16:16, Stephen Torri wrote:
> The issue of refusing to compile and waiting to run-time is the choice
> of the compiler designers to be fair.
No, it's very much part of the language. The choice of whether to _warn_ or
not might be the choice of the compiler designer, but it
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 13:27 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
> will (with g++ 3.3 anyway) compile without warnings but abort at run time,
> because g declares that it doesn't throw any exceptions but then fails to
> catch the one thrown by f. (It doesn't make any difference whether f
> declares its e
On Sunday 25 Jun 2006 21:35, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> As to the question of why exceptions are turned off in Qt, I have come
> across a couple of stories; one being that it was because exceptions
> weren't originally portable, and the other being that exceptions
> bloated the size of KDE/Qt applica
On Sunday 25 Jun 2006 20:20, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> Attached is what I get when I hit File -> Preview with Lilypond on the demo
> piece I just added.
I get an error, as follows. I don't know how this stuff is supposed to
work in Lilypond, so I can't make much immediate sense of it.
On 25/06/06, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'm happy. This really kicked my ass, but I figured it out, and it
> WORKS! Glee!
>
Huzzah!
> I no longer have any immediate plans to do something more pretty with these
> than the lame green boxes. I'd rather wor
On 26/06/06, Michelle Donalies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A third thing I'm working on is where the automatic generation of tab data
> should go. I stuck it in the staff initialization for simplicity, but that's
> not a very good place. I'm thinking of putting it in with staff type / tuning
> s
