Hi rosgarden-devel-list,
Today I give rosegarden a try and found a view bugs in the german translation.
1.
The eventlisteditor is named "Evenlisteditor". There's a "t" missing. It
should be "Eventlisteditor".
2.
In all menus the quarter note rest has the label of the quarter note and the
eighth n
On Wednesday, 28 June 2006 11:48, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Three options:
>
> [A] Release 1.2.4 ASAP. Continue working in trunk towards 1.4 in a year
> or so. Skip 1.3 entirely. I think this sounds like what Pedro's
> suggesting.
>
> [B] Tidy up the features that are in trunk already, fix a few m
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 04:32, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 June 2006 5:28 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > There are several new features in trunk, started but unfinished: guitar
>
> I just got different barline types and glissandi done.
Why don't we actually make
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 5:16 am, Vince Negri wrote:
> > Yeahbut what I was getting at was an official tarball release of
> > the "experimental" branch in the form of a periodic trunk snapshot. Only
> > a tiny number of people ever check out SVN.
>
> Also, the svn trunk will swing between "unstab
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 5:48 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> I think I probably vote for B.
I'll second that. It just doesn't seem there's enough bug fixing to take time
for a 1.2.4, and 1.3.x is "pretty close."
I think we ought to set a firm deadline, and keep it. I'd like to pick
August 14th,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 Jun 2006 11:07, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> Regarding the parameter area update, I suspect that I'm not going to
>> get much more done before I head off to Chile on Saturday, and it
>> seems unlikely that I will have much time for the 3 week
On Wednesday 28 Jun 2006 11:07, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Regarding the parameter area update, I suspect that I'm not going to
> get much more done before I head off to Chile on Saturday, and it
> seems unlikely that I will have much time for the 3 weeks that I'm
> there. Thus, a month is probably a
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I'm not pushing for a new featured release just now, because there are some
> new features started, that still need a bit of work to become ready for
> general use. Perhaps one month or two (talking for myself).
Regarding the parameter area upd
On Wednesday 28 Jun 2006 10:48, Chris Cannam wrote:
> There's also the option of a separate unstable series
And also of branch releases, for example with features that might not be
mainstream (such as the Glasgow pitch tracker -- which reminds me, I haven't
replied to an email from Dougie that I
On Wednesday 28 Jun 2006 06:57, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> And that was my proposal, too. If we delay the next release a long time,
> because the new featuires require a lot of time for cooking, at least let
> the users to have a bugfix release, with no new features but less bugs than
> the 1.
On 27/06/06, Vince Negri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/06/06, Michelle Donalies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I created a class for the tuning called TabTuning. Essentially, it looks
> > like:
> >
> > struct { int pitch, int frets } TabString;
> >
> > class TabTuning
> > {
> > ve
> Yeahbut what I was getting at was an official tarball release of
> the "experimental" branch in the form of a periodic trunk snapshot. Only a
> tiny number of people ever check out SVN.
Also, the svn trunk will swing between "unstable but worth tinkering
with" and "segfaults when you breathe on
12 matches
Mail list logo
