On Friday 07 Jul 2006 21:30, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I've seen the site fixed earlier this afternoon. But it is now
> announcing RG-1.0 again.
I decided in the end to move it across to a different hosting provider.
Check your DNS: the new one is 64.6.238.87, the old 217.158.120.142.
I _
On Friday, 7 July 2006 16:17, Chris Cannam wrote:
> You likely haven't noticed, but the RG website has been having some
> problems -- it disappeared completely this morning, and now appears to have
> been restored from out-of-date backups by the hosting provider (it's gone
> back to advertising the
On Friday, 7 July 2006 20:20, Stefan Asserhall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is an updated Swedish translation for the upcoming release. Could
> you please commit it to the 1.2.4 branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan Asserhäll
Committed, Thank you very much.
Regards,
Pedro
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need
On Friday 07 July 2006 4:24 am, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
> I would like to (am going to) drop LilyPond 2.2 and 2.4 from the trunk
> (1.3?) mainly for the following reasons:
> are so remarkable, that an average should be protected from the above
> difficulties. LilyPond versions 2.6 and later
The first prerelease of Rosegarden-4 1.2.4 is now available as a source
code tarball from:
http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/rosegarden-4-1.2.4pre1.tar.bz2
It is planned to be released next friday, July 14 2006, as a bugfix release.
Please, test it and report problems. Thanks.
Regards,
Pedro
On Friday, 7 July 2006 18:47, Emmanuel Saracco wrote:
> This pre-release can not be built with gcc-4.1.2 (Debian/sid):
> The tiny patch in attachment for the "gui/matrixview.h" header fixed the
> problem for me.
Applied now, Thanks!
It will be included in the first Release Candidate.
Regards,
Ped
Le vendredi 07 juillet 2006 à 17:27 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas a
écrit :
Hi,
> The first prerelease of Rosegarden-4 1.2.4 is now available as a source
> code tarball from:
>
> http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/rosegarden-4-1.2.4pre1.tar.bz2
>
> It is planned to be released next friday, July
Hi all,
A new release of Rosegarden is scheduled for next friday, July 14. This will
be a bugfix only release, with no new features. If your translation has been
updated for Rosegarden-1.2.3 there should be very little work to do, but
several bugs has been fixed related to i18n problems, and y
You likely haven't noticed, but the RG website has been having some
problems -- it disappeared completely this morning, and now appears to have
been restored from out-of-date backups by the hosting provider (it's gone
back to advertising the 1.0 release). I don't seem to be able to connect to
On Thursday 06 July 2006 10:30 pm, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
>> big to post it to the list? The compressed tar file of the whole thing is
>> 4.1 MB.
> 40K is the limit for attachments.
Well, that rules that out. If anyone wants to see it, I'll email it to you.
Using Tomcat but need to
Okay, now I better understand what you guys are talking about, and it makes
more sense. When I was thinking of expanding the meaning of an instrument
definition, I was thinking of bringing up a tabbed dialog. The whole thing
gets a name, tuning (for stringed instruments), and maybe some master
> I've tried, with Ravel and Glazunov examples, exporting the pieces with the
> same options:
> Compatibility level: Lilypond 1.6 or 1.8
> Export document properties as \header block
> Export beamings
>
> The results are different before and after the patches. I've attached
Hi,
This idea about associating instruments to segments instead of tracks
needs to be elaborated deeper. I think it will not be ready to be
released in Rosegarden 1.3, so everything is still open, and it will
remain open for some time.
I dont see necessary to make this new association mandatory.
13 matches
Mail list logo
