Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7401] trunk/rosegarden/gui/segmentparameterbox.cpp

2006-07-23 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Sunday 23 July 2006 5:34 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > I've committed just now a now proposal, using the class KSqueezedTextLabel, > which automatically squeezes its text. I've also added a label "Preset" and > moved the button to the right, with a label that says only "Load". The > squee

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-bugs] SF.net SVN: rosegarden: [7401] trunk/rosegarden/gui/segmentparameterbox.cpp

2006-07-23 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Sunday, 23 July 2006 22:49, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > So if I cut that stupid gigantic label down to some sensible size... I've committed just now a now proposal, using the class KSqueezedTextLabel, which automatically squeezes its text. I've also added a label "Preset" and moved

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] update...

2006-07-23 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Sunday 23 July 2006 9:10 am, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > On Sunday, 23 July 2006 09:33, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > > QT layout is evil. Twiddle, compile, worse. Twiddle, compile, worse. > > Alternate method proposed: draw it first in a paper, code, compile, test, > and finally s

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] update...

2006-07-23 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Sunday, 23 July 2006 09:33, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > QT layout is evil. Twiddle, compile, worse. Twiddle, compile, worse. Alternate method proposed: draw it first in a paper, code, compile, test, and finally smile :) > I will commit > it with everything worked out but the layo

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] rosegarden dies if lirc isn't configured

2006-07-23 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Sunday, 23 July 2006 10:08, Mike O'Connor wrote: > I received this report via the Debian bug tracking system: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=374814 > > It seems that when lirc is installed, but there is no valid lirc config > found, rosegarden dies. > > It seems like it wou

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] code obfuscation award winner!

2006-07-23 Thread Vince Negri
On 23/07/06, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Torri: > > Legal as in C++ compilers allow. Illegal if you want code that is > > maintainable others. > > Ooh, you've got me on the ropes! > > Did either of you actually have to spend a significant > amount of time to work out what that

[Rosegarden-devel] rosegarden dies if lirc isn't configured

2006-07-23 Thread Mike O'Connor
I received this report via the Debian bug tracking system: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=374814 It seems that when lirc is installed, but there is no valid lirc config found, rosegarden dies. It seems like it would be better if instead, rosegarden would just continue with a wa

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] code obfuscation award winner!

2006-07-23 Thread Chris Cannam
Stephen Torri: > Legal as in C++ compilers allow. Illegal if you want code that is > maintainable others. Ooh, you've got me on the ropes! Did either of you actually have to spend a significant amount of time to work out what that syntax did, or is the problem just that it looks weird? Maybe I

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] update...

2006-07-23 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Saturday 22 July 2006 7:28 am, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > You can commit it, and I will try to fix it. Anyway, I think that you need > to look at the top of the constructor, some lines saying: QT layout is evil. Twiddle, compile, worse. Twiddle, compile, worse. Adding these buttons mad