On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 03:35 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:01, I wrote:
> > The problem must be at the rendering part, I guess.
>
> I've committed a patch trying to fix this issue. First, the Event constructor
> at Fingering::getAsEvent() was wrong (it needs
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:01, I wrote:
> The problem must be at the rendering part, I guess.
I've committed a patch trying to fix this issue. First, the Event constructor
at Fingering::getAsEvent() was wrong (it needs four arguments). It now sets
the sub-ordering property to -60 as you want
On Saturday 29 July 2006 2:19 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> That's Michelle, right ? I wish she had replied to my request to provide a
> patch using standard tools :-).
Me too.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Lin
I had in mind that this Chord Overlapping Mode would be the default mode. In addition to this mode there would be two other modes: - Solo Mode (no chords at all) instead of chord overlapping mode;this was the earlier mode, and
- Chord Mode (do not proceed in time at all); as it also was previously
On Saturday 29 July 2006 4:45 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> Don't worry, it is fixed now.
I saw. Nice turnaround.
> Except if you are writting music for a monophonic instrument like a flute.
> In this case the old behavior helps a bit avoiding to enter a chord by
> mistake.
This is true,
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:11, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 2:45 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > What I don't like is that the notation view starts now in select mode,
> > instead of insert mode with quarter note duration enabled. This changed
> > in SVN af
On Saturday 29 July 2006 3:10 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> We should probably update the notation view mode logic so that it only
> checks for notes, rather than reverting Michael's change (which was
> sound I think).
Ah. That makes sense. I knew there would be at least one unintended
consequence
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:10, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Saturday 29 Jul 2006 19:45, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > What I don't like is that the notation view starts now in select
> > mode, instead of insert mode with quarter note duration enabled.
>
> I haven't checked, but I think this is an
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 20:19 +0200, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 19:05, Stephen Torri wrote:
> >
> > I am working on the next generation of the guitar chord. What you see at
> > present is a prototype which is going to be radically changed. The
> > present prototype allows the
On Saturday 29 Jul 2006 20:11, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> I agree with the principle of not breaking things users have come to
> expect, but I honestly think the old behavior in this case was
> actually broken all along, and this new behavior is a bug fix.
OK, the consensus seems to be
On Saturday 29 July 2006 2:45 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> What I don't like is that the notation view starts now in select mode,
> instead of insert mode with quarter note duration enabled. This changed in
> SVN after 1.2.3, I think.
So it does. I can't think if I would have broken that.
On Saturday 29 Jul 2006 19:45, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> What I don't like is that the notation view starts now in select
> mode, instead of insert mode with quarter note duration enabled.
I haven't checked, but I think this is an unintended consequence of
Michael's having changed the segme
On Saturday 29 July 2006 3:01 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I think that there is nothing wrong in this code fragment. You are
> calculating the insertionTime correctly, and you can see in the event list
> editor that your fingering events have the right times. The problem must be
> at the r
On Saturday 29 July 2006 2:09 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I don't have a "show fretboard" command. I think that you need to set the
> fretboard mode, pressing the button without a real icon (next to the "text"
No real icon? I committed an icon for this some time back, and it shows up
he
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:25, Stephen Torri wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 20:09 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > I think that there is a bug: the chord diagrams aren't drawn over the
> > notehead you clicked, but one or two beats after it.
>
> How you suggest I get the position of where
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 09:50, Chris Cannam wrote:
> It works quite well. Give it a try -- you have to
> enable "chord overlapping notes" mode in the tools
> menu of the notation window.
Tried, and it works nicely here. I must say that I've never used the step
recording before, so I am not in
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 20:09 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> I think that there is a bug: the chord diagrams aren't drawn over the
> notehead
> you clicked, but one or two beats after it.
How you suggest I get the position of where to play the diagram? At
present I try to calculate the cl
On Saturday 29 July 2006 19:05, Stephen Torri wrote:
>
> I am working on the next generation of the guitar chord. What you see at
> present is a prototype which is going to be radically changed. The
> present prototype allows the user to create, modify or select chords.
> The new version is going t
On Saturday, 29 July 2006 12:26, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> I can't find a way to invoke it ('show fretboard' fails).
>
> So what's up ?
I don't have a "show fretboard" command. I think that you need to set the
fretboard mode, pressing the button without a real icon (next to the "text"
mode one)
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 12:26 +0200, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Can anyone bring me up to date on the current status of the guitar-related
> code ? I'm looking into it right now and it seems to be missing some bits (it
> refers to some rc files, guitar.rc fretboardinserter.rc, some classes aren't
On Saturday 29 July 2006 9:26 am, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> Hrm. I don't have any of that, because I didn't install last time. It
> seems to be on by default. I've compared an older installed build against
> the one in RGBuild, and this behavior has changed.
Wow! My message just s
On Saturday 29 July 2006 3:50 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> It works quite well. Give it a try -- you have to
> enable "chord overlapping notes" mode in the tools
> menu of the notation window.
Hrm. I don't have any of that, because I didn't install last time. It seems
to be on by default. I've
Can anyone bring me up to date on the current status of the guitar-related
code ? I'm looking into it right now and it seems to be missing some bits (it
refers to some rc files, guitar.rc fretboardinserter.rc, some classes aren't
used anywhere - GuitarTabEditorWindow), and I can't find a way to
G:
> Seems to me that this behavior is what people would expect, and I'm not sure
> how the oppositve behavior would be at all useful, so I wouldn't even make it
> configurable.
That is basically what I'm suggesting, but I should
have mentioned the disadvantage -- one often plays
notes with a
On Saturday 29 July 2006 09:50, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Heikki has just implemented a welcome feature -- one
> I meant to do and wrote a comment about years ago,
> but got bogged down in trying to think of the perfect
> algorithm for rather than sensibly doing the simplest
> way. This is making step
Heikki has just implemented a welcome feature -- one
I meant to do and wrote a comment about years ago,
but got bogged down in trying to think of the perfect
algorithm for rather than sensibly doing the simplest
way. This is making step-record generate chords
when it receives notes that over
26 matches
Mail list logo
