On Monday 25 September 2006 22:13, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
> the visible area that doesn't trigger scrolling. With Guillarme's
> patch, scrolling restarts with the same speed as before, when the
> mouse is again moved into the autoscrolling region, whereas with mine,
> it starts from the slow init
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:34, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> I'm guessing that Guillarme made another patch after his
>> announcement.
>
> There's a mailing list (rg-bugs) that gets notifications of all the
> Subversion commits, if you want to check that kind o
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:34, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> I'm guessing that Guillarme made another patch after his
> announcement.
There's a mailing list (rg-bugs) that gets notifications of all the
Subversion commits, if you want to check that kind of thing.
> I can't immediately see what was done
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:07, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> Curious. I modified the code after doing an svn update. Since this
>> followed Guillarme's post about his patch, I assumed that I was
>> modifying against his final patch. Was this not made to trunk?
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:07, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Curious. I modified the code after doing an svn update. Since this
> followed Guillarme's post about his patch, I assumed that I was
> modifying against his final patch. Was this not made to trunk?
Yes, I think it was. I'm up-to-date on trunk
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 02:39, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> What my previous patch didn't address, was another problem that I
>> previously noted, wherein if one didn't manage to drag the cursor
>> quickly enough to the edge of the matrix view, smoot
On Sunday, 24 September 2006 15:13, Chris Cannam wrote:
> The debug output about a track ID not being found is a bit alarming. I
> get that too, and I hadn't noticed before. That means it evidently
> isn't causing the crash, but still.
It is alarming, but harmless. I've done an analysis of it, p
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 02:39, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> What my previous patch didn't address, was another problem that I
> previously noted, wherein if one didn't manage to drag the cursor
> quickly enough to the edge of the matrix view, smooth scrolling
> didn't start. The following patch, which in
