Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > and we were getting yelled at. Should I cheat? :) Could we help you cheat by renaming these things from .pfa to .this_is_not_a_font_file? :D -- D. Michael McIntyre

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > I am confused here. The patch just adds new plugin search paths. On 32 > bit Fedora /usr/lib64/ does not exist but we still apply the patch and > the software works. I'm going to defer to Chris to explain why we can't accept this. I've forgot

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Dave Plater wrote: > This thread has prompted me to clean up my spec file which I will post > (once the heavily congested ATM build service has finished) when I'm > happy with it and your comments on the %install and %files section will > be welcome. All of this is a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Editor Window fails to launch in 10 .02.1 AV Linux (Debian Testing)

2010-02-20 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Clem, Brian T. wrote: > YOU: Setting graphics system for Qt 4.5+ to: native > ME: Setting graphics system for Qt 4.5+ to: raster That was a good catch, Brian. There may be something to that. The native vs. raster setting is something that got bounced back and fort

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Editor Window fails to launch in 10.02.1 AV Linux (Debian Testing)

2010-02-20 Thread Clem, Brian T.
Hi AVLinux and Rosegarden, I am running Rosegarden from the SVN from about a week ago and AV_Linux_3.0.1 and I am scared to update my RG. Everything works including most of my VST and VSTi (and the ones that dont work are clearly not a RG issue). I already finished one piece for an upcoming s

[Rosegarden-devel] Editor Window fails to launch in 10.02.1 AV Linux (Debian Testing)

2010-02-20 Thread info
Hello, I have been building Rosegarden Thorn packages for AV Linux (Debian Testing) since 10.02 Alpha1, all have worked flawlessly until now. Upon installing this package Rosegarden will display it's splash screen and produce an iconized Window in the panel that doesn't render or display. Terminal

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Luis Garrido
> This is exactly what I said when we were asked to separate the font > files. They didn't want to make an exception, which I had to accept. > Not that I am kind of tempted to leave the fonts in the binary because > their font file detection scripts will not find them anymore. :) This > was not the

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] lirc - success

2010-02-20 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Andrew wrote: > OK, apologies; yes, the /trunk is what had the fix Yes, I should have mentioned that I just put it into trunk and didn't care about the branch. > That said, it might be useful to add an "UNDO" and "REDO" and perhaps a > few other essentials to the config. A

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Luis Garrido wrote: >> I understand. But there is a strict Fedora policy here that a fonts >> file must go to /usr/share/fonts (period) >> (I can try dealing with this with symlinks though. Yet I still have to >> patch the fonts out of the .qrc file) >> This is main

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Dave Plater
On 02/20/2010 10:38 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Dave Plater wrote: > >> On 02/19/2010 08:54 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: >> >>> 2) Can we add the line GenericName=Audio and MIDI Sequencer to data/desktop/rosegarden.desktop ? >>

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Luis Garrido
> I understand. But there is a strict Fedora policy here that a fonts > file must go to /usr/share/fonts (period) > (I can try dealing with this with symlinks though. Yet I still have to > patch the fonts out of the .qrc file) > This is mainly to avoid duplication of system fonts. If these feta and

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Dave Plater
On 02/20/2010 11:11 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Dave Plater wrote: > >> I'm lead to understand that >> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/rosegarden.png is the correct place and >> > Minor correction: This needs to be > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/rosega

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Yes. That is exactly what I need. To solidify let me make up an example: > So if CXXFLAGS is predefined, its contents should not be overridden by > you. But I should be able to override your defaults. OK, I will do as described. [fonts] > T

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Dave Plater wrote: > I'm lead to understand that > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/rosegarden.png is the correct place and Minor correction: This needs to be /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/rosegarden.png which is correct in your standard installation. Then Ic

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:54 AM, D. Michael McIntyre > wrote: > > Happy to do something to help out here, but I want to be clearer on > what's needed.  The configure sets CXXFLAGS to contain both defines > that are meaningful to our code (e.g.

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Dave Plater wrote: > On 02/19/2010 08:54 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: >> >>> 2) Can we add the line >>>    GenericName=Audio and MIDI Sequencer >>> to data/desktop/rosegarden.desktop ? >>> >> Yes. >> > I've copied and fixed the desktop file a long time ago and ins

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Packaging issues on Fedora

2010-02-20 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Hi Michael, thanks for your reply! On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:54 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > >> 6) The DSSI and LADSPA plugin paths are wrong on 64 bit systems. I am >> attaching a patch to correct the issue. > > Wrong on 64-bit systems on c