Re: [Rosegarden-devel] segment symlinks - how difficult to implement?

2010-05-26 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Julie S wrote: > Now lets say I wanted to uses this a as the basis of a 12 measure blues > progression. > That example was the kind of thing I initially thought you were talking > about. That way if I decide to change the source sym-link segment to C Eb > G C. I get

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] segment symlinks - how difficult to implement?

2010-05-26 Thread Julie S
Hello Michael, > > However, allowing clean editing of these > transpositions is something to be > > considered.  Should the user be able to update > these through the Special > > Parameter areas that allow them to edit other segment > properties, or > > should they double-click on the segments to

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Patch - triggered segments

2010-05-26 Thread Julie S
Hello Michael, > > -2) Because a complex segment requiring several time > signatures would be > > very different from the current short triggered > segment. To call such a > > long segment through the elsewhere discussed "segment > link" should > > probably be better than to call it through some >

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] segment symlinks - how difficult to implement?

2010-05-26 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Julie S wrote: > However, allowing clean editing of these transpositions is something to be > considered. Should the user be able to update these through the Special > Parameter areas that allow them to edit other segment properties, or > should they double-click on th

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Patch - triggered segments

2010-05-26 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Yves Guillemot wrote: > -2) Because a complex segment requiring several time signatures would be > very different from the current short triggered segment. To call such a > long segment through the elsewhere discussed "segment link" should > probably be better than to c

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Patch - triggered segments

2010-05-26 Thread Julie S
Hello Yves, I can not argue your points in your last post. They are fine arguments. I withdraw the triggered segment track idea. ... I am interested in allowing more robust editing of triggered segments. To that end we would need a way to play them back in tempo with a desired instrument, a

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Patch - triggered segments

2010-05-26 Thread Yves Guillemot
Le mercredi 26 mai 2010 15:51:14, Julie S a écrit : > > I see your points on here, but if we instead used a triggered segment > track, which would be a specialized MIDI type track. Then users could use > RG's current functionality to select the instrument to associate with the > segment. > >

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Patch - triggered segments

2010-05-26 Thread Julie S
Hello Yves, Concerning: > One problem is that triggered segments will be edited with > time signature > coming from the composition. > That's already the case with Ian's patch: Modifying the > composition time > signature changes the way the triggered segment is > displayed in the notation > ed

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] segment symlinks - how difficult to implement?

2010-05-26 Thread Julie S
Hello Michael, Concerning: > I can agree that symlinks should not change with respect to > duration or > velocity, for the sake of simplicity, but pitch is a huge > can of worms. And the rest of your post. You make very compelling points to keep the pitch adjustable. One could argue the benefi