Re: [Rosegarden-devel] recording with the latest build

2012-04-16 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > It is possible to record on a track that already has segments on it. Yes it is. > That's a thought. It seems possible but potentially complex. I lean > towards another approach: don't arm recording for auto instruments, and > pop up an ex

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] recording with the latest build

2012-04-16 Thread Tom Breton (Tehom)
> On 4/15/2012 4:46 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: >> Somewhat dirty, in that it assumes all instruments are fixed. I didn't >> see a good way to deal with playing on a track with "auto" or audio >> instruments. Since I wrote this, I made it cleaner: it no longer assumes, it checks and if it's non-

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] recording with the latest build

2012-04-16 Thread Aere Greenway
All: I do not have the latest development version of Rosegarden - only the version that came with Ubuntu 11.10. I have noticed it is easy to be confused about this sort of thing. I tend to use Qjackctl to make connections, and I have seen at least one instance where it was one of my manually

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] recording with the latest build

2012-04-16 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday, April 16, 2012, Ted Felix wrote: >As it is, it works for me. But it might cause confusion for other > users. I wonder how other sequencers deal with this. As far as I know, no other sequencer does anything like this. Normally you just set a track to play through what MIDI outpu

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] recording with the latest build

2012-04-16 Thread Ted Felix
On 4/15/2012 4:46 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > Somewhat dirty, in that it assumes all instruments are fixed. I didn't > see a good way to deal with playing on a track with "auto" or audio > instruments. I tried it out and it works fine for tracks in "fixed" mode. Maybe when an auto mod