Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 23:48:14, Ian Gardner a écrit :
>
> I'm aiming to get something committed this week, need to iron out a few
> probs, tidy up the code, put all my broken serialisation and transposition
> back together then we should be good to go with doing something for
> repeating
On Sunday, January 02, 2011, Ian Gardner wrote:
> I'm aiming to get something committed this week, need to iron out a few
> probs, tidy up the code, put all my broken serialisation and transposition
> back together then we should be good to go with doing something for
> repeating segments.
Sounds
> Hi Yves, Michael and all,
>
> I've had a look at your implementation Yves, from a practical perspective
>using
>
> aggregation to preserve the original segment is a feature worth having,
> particularly to prevent undesirable spontaneous closing of editors.
>
> You are right in something
On Monday, December 27, 2010, Ian Gardner wrote:
> Cheers, hope you're all having good Christmases and holidays,
Thanks! Quite busy here, but following this thread with interest.
It sounds like you two can probably come to some middle ground soon, and we
can think about merging this into trunk
> It's going to take me another couple of evenings - I haven't disappeared,
> bear
>
> with...
>
Hi Yves, Michael and all,
I've had a look at your implementation Yves, from a practical perspective using
aggregation to preserve the original segment is a feature worth having,
particularly to
> I imagine this will take me a couple of evenings at least.
It's going to take me another couple of evenings - I haven't disappeared, bear
with...
Ian.
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:24:36PM +, Ian Gardner wrote:
> There's a putative implementation of having a relative transposition on a
> linked segment, committed to the linked_segments_ian branch.
Sounds interesting.
> I'm operating at the misty outer limits of my understanding of musical
>
> On Monday, December 20, 2010, Yves Guillemot wrote:
>
> > So I would like we both try to converge to a common base as shortly as
> > possible.
>
> I'd like to see that too. I was planning to post in the next day or so to
> try
>
> to send a "keep alive" message for that work. I'd hate t
On Monday, December 20, 2010, Yves Guillemot wrote:
> So I would like we both try to converge to a common base as shortly as
> possible.
I'd like to see that too. I was planning to post in the next day or so to try
to send a "keep alive" message for that work. I'd hate to see it stall out,
be
Le jeudi 25 novembre 2010 23:24:36, Ian Gardner a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> There's a putative implementation of having a relative transposition on a
> linked segment, committed to the linked_segments_ian branch.
>
Hello Ian,
Sorry to come so late, but I was overbusy last weeks.
Did you have a
On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Ian Gardner wrote:
> There's a putative implementation of having a relative transposition on a
> linked segment, committed to the linked_segments_ian branch.
Did we ever settle on a better way to create linked segments? I had a lot of
trouble remembering the curr
On Thursday, November 25, 2010, Ian Gardner wrote:
> I've stuck a test UI on it, although I expect a jolly good flaming for my
> crimes against UI standards ;-)
I don't have time to dig into this today, but I'm looking forward to playing
with it.
If there are any crimes against UI standards, I'
Hello all,
There's a putative implementation of having a relative transposition on a
linked
segment, committed to the linked_segments_ian branch.
I've stuck a test UI on it, although I expect a jolly good flaming for my
crimes
against UI standards ;-)
I've put some buttons in a "Linked segme
13 matches
Mail list logo
