Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and

2004-05-10 Thread Vladimir Savic
That's completely different thing. There should be a prevention of doing doubled hairpin on same group of notes. Vladimir On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:19:22 +0100, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 10 May 2004 12:46 pm, William wrote: Are you sure w

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and

2004-05-10 Thread William
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 10 May 2004 12:46 pm, William wrote: >> Are you sure we are talking about exactly the same thing? >> I meant a crescendo mark can be put once underneath a group of >> selected notes, and then, the crescendo mark can be put again >> (second one)

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and

2004-05-10 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 10 May 2004 12:46 pm, William wrote: > Are you sure we are talking about exactly the same thing? > I meant a crescendo mark can be put once underneath a group of > selected notes, and then, the crescendo mark can be put again > (second one) in exactly the same position Oh! Well I think

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and

2004-05-10 Thread William
Vladimir Savic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There hasn't been any further followup, so I'd like to log this on sf as >> a bug. >> Any objections? I think most of the other well-known composition apps >> stop you from inserting multiply superimposed marks in th

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and

2004-05-10 Thread Vladimir Savic
On Sun, 9 May 2004 23:58:10 +0100, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +decrescendo marks To: Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] There hasn't been any further followup, so I'd like to log this on sf as a bug. Any objections? I think most of the other well-known compositi

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and decrescendo marks

2004-05-09 Thread William
+decrescendo marks To: Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] There hasn't been any further followup, so I'd like to log this on sf as a bug. Any objections? I think most of the other well-known composition apps stop you from inserting multiply superimposed marks in the notat

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and decrescendo marks

2004-04-14 Thread William
Chris Cannam wrote: > >William wrote: >> If this is not a bug, please say so, otherwise I'll log it on sf. >> >> In the notation editor, it is possible to insert crescendo marks >> and decrescendo marks, more than once on the same group of notes, >> thus creating one or more redundant overlapped in

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and decrescendo marks

2004-04-14 Thread Chris Cannam
On Friday 09 Apr 2004 6:07 pm, William wrote: > If this is not a bug, please say so, otherwise I'll log it on sf. > > In the notation editor, it is possible to insert crescendo marks > and decrescendo marks, more than once on the same group of notes, > thus creating one or more redundant overlapped

[Rosegarden-devel] Notation: redundant insertions of crescendo and decrescendo marks

2004-04-09 Thread William
If this is not a bug, please say so, otherwise I'll log it on sf. In the notation editor, it is possible to insert crescendo marks and decrescendo marks, more than once on the same group of notes, thus creating one or more redundant overlapped instances and, in the case of a mixture, a superpositi