Hello Luis,
Thank you for the information, that confirms my understanding. Thank you for
the detailed explanation as well.
Typically, I just research this stuff myself instead of asking, but I was (at
the time) feeling pressed to get the bug fix out before re-release...but that
turns out to n
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:28 AM, D. Michael McIntyre
wrote:
> On Sunday, February 06, 2011, Julie S wrote:
>
>> Since "this" is inherits from QGroupBox in this case, it appears Qt will
>> take care of the details of deleting the QTimer.
>
> I think that's probably right. I'm not 100% sure myself.
On Sunday, February 06, 2011, Julie S wrote:
> Since "this" is inherits from QGroupBox in this case, it appears Qt will
> take care of the details of deleting the QTimer.
I think that's probably right. I'm not 100% sure myself.
--
D. Michael McIntyre
---
Hello All,
Concerning my question:
> Is this true for QTimer as well? In my case I'm
> passing I'm doing this:
>
> m_delayUpdateTimer = new QTimer(this);
>
Since "this" is inherits from QGroupBox in this case, it appears Qt will take
care of the details of deleting the QTimer.
If this is inc
Hello All,
I know that typically when we use Qt and create GUI items like buttons, check
boxes, etc. We don't explicitly use "delete" on them in a Classes destructor.
Is this true for QTimer as well? In my case I'm passing I'm doing this:
m_delayUpdateTimer = new QTimer(this);
So will Qt han
