On Sunday 16 May 2004 6:33 pm, William wrote:
> Vladimir Savic wrote:
> > Can we record into segment directly?!
>
> I think RG always records onto a track, not onto a segment.
Yes, RG always creates a new segment when you start recording.
Actually (another diversion here) this can be a bit of a
Vladimir Savic wrote:
> William wrote:
>> By the way, I notice you emailed it to me but not to rosegarden-devel.
>> Did you mean to do that?
> Surely no!
Would you like to reply again with your attachment so that everyone else can
see what it is that we're discussing?
> Dope!!! Sometimes I just f
On Sat, 15 May 2004 17:37:37 +0100, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Savic wrote:
Now there is one attached... I hope so...
Thanks.
By the way, I notice you emailed it to me but not to rosegarden-devel.
Did you mean to do that?
Surely no!
It might be useful for the others if we continu
Vladimir Savic wrote:
> William wrote:
>> Regarding Vladimir's method of part-writing, I have attached an example
>> to show where it doesn't work; the problem is that notes do not override
>> rests in the notation editor, resulting in an ugly overlap of notes and
>> rests. Nonetheless, it's not
On Fri, 14 May 2004 16:20:32 +0100, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding Vladimir's method of part-writing, I have attached an example
to show where it doesn't work; the problem is that notes do not override
rests
in the notation editor, resulting in an ugly overlap of notes and rests.
N
On Friday 14 May 2004 09:02 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 11:46, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > On Friday 14 May 2004 10:10, Vladimir Savic wrote:
> > > 1. After joining of segments duplicated clefs are not deleted
> >
> > [...] Maybe I'll do that for rc2 as well.
>
> OK, fixed in CVS no
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 May 2004 14:13, William wrote:
>> 2) Part-writing/editing (notation for multiple voices on a stave).
>> I think this is the most important new feature
>> which the notation editor needs. It is also likely not trivial to code.
>
> A
On Friday 14 May 2004 14:13, William wrote:
> 2) Part-writing/editing (notation for multiple voices on a stave).
> I think this is the most important new feature
> which the notation editor needs. It is also likely not trivial to code.
Agreed. (To both.)
> 4) Multi-track editing in n
Vladimir Savic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is, at your oppinion, the most needed to improve in notation?
> Would like to hear that from the others too!
1) Chord notation (see below).
2) Part-writing/editing (notation for multiple voices on a stave).
I think this is the most import
On Fri, 14 May 2004 13:43:20 +0100, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Savic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's really better that way than allowing me to write some
hardly understandable eastern european english nonsenses :-).
I think I can understand you well enough.
Please don't stop wr
Vladimir Savic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Will you please open a bug report on this one.
I have logged a bug report #953922,
"Notation: Missing barline at stave-end in Cont/Multi.Pag.Lyt"
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=953922&group_id=4932&atid=104932
> It's really
On Friday 14 May 2004 11:46, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 10:10, Vladimir Savic wrote:
> > 1. After joining of segments duplicated clefs are not deleted
>
> [...] Maybe I'll do that for rc2 as well.
OK, fixed in CVS now.
Chris
On Fri, 14 May 2004 11:46:18 +, Chris Cannam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 10:10, Vladimir Savic wrote:
2. If there is a key change, previous key must be... huf (how to say
that
in english), anyway I'll try, flat is to be sharped and sharp is to be
flatted to the natural
Chris Cannam wrote:
> Vladimir Savic wrote:
>> 2. If there is a key change, previous key must be... huf (how to say that
>> in english), anyway I'll try, flat is to be sharped and sharp is to be
>> flatted to the natural (as in C and a-minor) just before that key change.
>> How do you call that, th
On Friday 14 May 2004 10:10, Vladimir Savic wrote:
> 1. After joining of segments duplicated clefs are not deleted
Funnily enough I was just reading a bug Silvan filed ages ago against exactly
this problem. I never fixed it because I misunderstood what it was about --
I thought it was one of th
Here is the sum of problems I'm dealing with described through nonsense
picture example:
1. After joining of segments duplicated clefs are not deleted (where's
that automation :) I've never seen two namely same clefs one after
another. (maybe this could be an option in configure dialog for enab
16 matches
Mail list logo
