On Tuesday 26 September 2006 18:02, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 September 2006 4:48 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > On Monday 25 Sep 2006 23:18, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > > Since the autoscrolling is mostly Chris's work, perhaps he'll want to
> > > check
> >
> > It is? I don't recall
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 4:48 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 23:18, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > Since the autoscrolling is mostly Chris's work, perhaps he'll want to
> > check
>
> It is? I don't recall having had anything to do with it.
>
> Maybe I just don't recall.
Wasn't
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 23:18, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Since the autoscrolling is mostly Chris's work, perhaps he'll want to check
It is? I don't recall having had anything to do with it.
Maybe I just don't recall.
Chris
---
On Monday 25 September 2006 22:13, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>
> the visible area that doesn't trigger scrolling. With Guillarme's
> patch, scrolling restarts with the same speed as before, when the
> mouse is again moved into the autoscrolling region, whereas with mine,
> it starts from the slow init
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:34, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> I'm guessing that Guillarme made another patch after his
>> announcement.
>
> There's a mailing list (rg-bugs) that gets notifications of all the
> Subversion commits, if you want to check that kind o
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:34, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> I'm guessing that Guillarme made another patch after his
> announcement.
There's a mailing list (rg-bugs) that gets notifications of all the
Subversion commits, if you want to check that kind of thing.
> I can't immediately see what was done
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:07, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> Curious. I modified the code after doing an svn update. Since this
>> followed Guillarme's post about his patch, I assumed that I was
>> modifying against his final patch. Was this not made to trunk?
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 20:07, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Curious. I modified the code after doing an svn update. Since this
> followed Guillarme's post about his patch, I assumed that I was
> modifying against his final patch. Was this not made to trunk?
Yes, I think it was. I'm up-to-date on trunk
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Monday 25 Sep 2006 02:39, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>> What my previous patch didn't address, was another problem that I
>> previously noted, wherein if one didn't manage to drag the cursor
>> quickly enough to the edge of the matrix view, smoot
On Monday 25 Sep 2006 02:39, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> What my previous patch didn't address, was another problem that I
> previously noted, wherein if one didn't manage to drag the cursor
> quickly enough to the edge of the matrix view, smooth scrolling
> didn't start. The following patch, which in
What my previous patch didn't address, was another problem that I
previously noted, wherein if one didn't manage to drag the cursor
quickly enough to the edge of the matrix view, smooth scrolling didn't
start. The following patch, which includes the previous patch, fixes
this as well. Basically, th
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Martin Shepherd wrote:
>...
> So I believe the fix is to call slotSetInsertCursorPosition() with its
> optional scroll argument set to 0, when calling it from the mouse handler
> of the ruler. I haven't figured out how to do that yet.
Okay, the following patch does this, and
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Woops, just committed a fix for that (thanks Chris for pointing out the
> cause).
Thanks. However note that the fix restores the lightning-fast
autoscrolling behaviour. I have just taken a look through the code,
and I can see what is causing the li
On Sunday 24 September 2006 15:12, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Scrolling while setting a loop works in the top and bottom rulers in the
> main view, and in the top ruler in the matrix, but it doesn't work at
> all for me in the bottom ruler in the matrix or any ruler in notation.
> I'm not sure whether
On Sunday 24 September 2006 11:43, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> On Saturday 23 September 2006 7:47 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > Fixes are in, except for the first issue (autoscrolling happens too
> > quickly in some cases), which I haven't really looked into.
>
> I just tried this (assuming that it
On Sunday 24 Sep 2006 10:43, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> I just tried this (assuming that it is the version in svn), but it
> now doesn't seem to be possible to place the insertion cursor with
> the mouse, at all. Whenever I click on the bar above the matrix view,
> the insertion cursor initially appe
On Saturday 23 September 2006 7:47 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Fixes are in, except for the first issue (autoscrolling happens too quickly
> in some cases), which I haven't really looked into.
I just tried this (assuming that it is the version in svn), but it now
doesn't seem to be possible to
On Saturday 23 September 2006 7:47 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Fixes are in, except for the first issue (autoscrolling happens too quickly
> in some cases), which I haven't really looked into.
Right in time for the release! :D
I'll have to play with this, but the code looked good, and I'm op
On Saturday 16 September 2006 23:00, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> A long time ago we spent countless hours trying to get auto-scrolling
> right, and we did, as far as the move itself is concerned. However, how
> this move is propagated needs to be reworked. Looking into this bug
>
> https://sourcefor
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Saturday 16 September 2006 5:00 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> Another thing I noticed earlier today, autoscrolling while drawing out a long
> selection in notation doesn't seem to happen. Requires wiggling the mouse
> back and forth to keep th
On Saturday 16 September 2006 5:00 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> - autoscrolling while moving the playback pointer is propagated to the
> segment canvas. This is not by accident, but I'm not sure if it's such a
> good idea.
>
> - autoscrolling while defining a loop is broken (just doesn't happen)
A long time ago we spent countless hours trying to get auto-scrolling right,
and we did, as far as the move itself is concerned. However, how this move is
propagated needs to be reworked. Looking into this bug
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104932&aid=1052780&group_id=4932
I
22 matches
Mail list logo
