Hi
Less than 2000 errors now !
Best Regards,
Emanuel
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize
On Friday 26 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> Less than 2000 errors now !
I only count 864, and more than 76% compiling!
Please do keep up the excellent work!
--
D. Michael McIntyre
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored
On Saturday 27 September 2008 05:23:41 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Friday 26 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> > Less than 2000 errors now !
>
> I only count 864, and more than 76% compiling!
I count 1759 errors and 58% compiling with rev. 9437
Why such a difference ?
Yves
-
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Yves Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 05:23:41 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
>> On Friday 26 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
>> > Less than 2000 errors now !
>>
>> I only count 864, and more than 76% compiling!
>
> I count 1759
On Saturday 27 September 2008 10:29:00 Chris Cannam wrote:
> Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file?
Thanks Chris,
I don't : this should explain the difference.
Yves
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 10:29:00 Chris Cannam wrote:
> > Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file?
>
I tried to create it with
/usr/lib/qt4/bin/uic -o src/ui_RosegardenTransport.h \
src/gui/ui/RosegardenTransport.ui
but I don't get any new file compiling.
Di
2008/9/28 Yves Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Saturday 27 September 2008 10:29:00 Chris Cannam wrote:
>> > Do you have the RosegardenTransport uic-generated header file?
>>
>
> I tried to create it with
>
> /usr/lib/qt4/bin/uic -o src/ui_RosegardenTransport.h \
> src/gui/ui/RosegardenTr
On Sunday 28 September 2008, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> qt4-makefile still uses the old naming scheme, I think.
> use cmake
If I use CMake, I only get 30% compiling, which basically hasn't ever changed
the whole time we've had a working build system in the qt4 branch.
(Well, I haven't tried that fo
On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:32:33 Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> the name changed to ui_RosegardenTransport.h
> for the cmake build at least, I'm not sure here for the qt4-makefile
The qt4-makefile doesn't generate that file and therefore doesn't give any
name to it.
I created it by hand, without mod
What happened to the mailing lists ?
I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago...
On Monday 29 September 2008 06:24:01 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> If it's not the transport stuff, it could be all the missing .moc files,
Yes, some .moc files are missing, but I eventually found the main
Yves wrote:
> What happened to the mailing lists ?
> I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago...
me too. I thought everybody was quite, but it appears I messed most of the
dialog surrounding the coding of menus and toolbars.
It all just popped up today--and not all at one time eithe
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Julie S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yves wrote:
>> What happened to the mailing lists ?
>> I now just received about twenty mails sent days ago...
>
> me too.
Same here. I certainly have been getting some list mail during the
last few days, but perhaps it was jus
Can someone please give me an idea of where thorn is at for
functionality? Is the matrix editor working? I seem to not be able to
send note events with it.
Would you consider Thorn as a working product yet?
A historical question: Why was the project recoded instead of converted
and carried on?
Original Message
Subject: [Rosegarden-devel] Current State of Thorn
From: Christopher Cherrett
To: rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 04/21/09 21:54
> Can someone please give me an idea of where thorn is at for
> functionality? Is the matrix editor working? I s
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Christopher Cherrett
wrote:
> Can someone please give me an idea of where thorn is at for
> functionality? Is the matrix editor working? I seem to not be able to
> send note events with it.
>
> Would you consider Thorn as a working product yet?
No. It's still a p
15 matches
Mail list logo
