Re: [Rosegarden-devel] range field test

2006-06-19 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 19 Jun 2006 12:49, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Sunday 18 Jun 2006 17:25, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > > 4. Pasting interpreted (and presumably recorded/imported), > > notation-quantized data is problematic from a notation perspective. > > (IOW, THIS SUCKS BEAVIS!!!) > > Pasting in

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] range field test

2006-06-19 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sunday 18 Jun 2006 17:25, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > 4. Pasting interpreted (and presumably recorded/imported), > notation-quantized data is problematic from a notation perspective. (IOW, > THIS SUCKS BEAVIS!!!) Pasting in general doesn't preserve notation quantization. As you say

[Rosegarden-devel] range field test

2006-06-18 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
1. Setting the beginning and end of the range with the old ctrl+click interface seems to be insufficiently precise for this use. I tried to set a range from here to here, and copied and pasted, and wound up with some fraction of a note on the wrong side of the line. I had to undo, and try agai