On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:42:58 +0200, Silvan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * the stereo/mono icons for audio parameters/audio mixer look very
jaggy
I just did these. I was in the code in that spot anyway, so I switched
them
over to .png and doctored them up.
Ad...
1 point goes
> > * the stereo/mono icons for audio parameters/audio mixer look very jaggy
I just did these. I was in the code in that spot anyway, so I switched them
over to .png and doctored them up.
--
Michael McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Lin
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:21 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > Of what, just *this* icon, sans halo?
>
> No -- of just that icon, avec halo.
Funny. I just realized that "sans" has made it into the dictionary, but
"avec" has not. In fact, if we wanted a fancy foreign-sounding word for
"with" the bes
On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:35:23 +0200, Silvan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* the star and X hanging down toward the bottom on the add/delete segment
icons
* the three original open in [EDITOR] icons (the new drum matrix one
looks OK,
though it's a little jaggy, and might could do with some s
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:54, Silvan wrote:
> On Monday 23 May 2005 02:21 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > makes it look a little irregular. I'd like to see the original
> > .png of just the icon in order to check it in situ, as well.
>
> Of what, just *this* icon, sans halo?
No -- of just that icon,
On Monday 23 May 2005 07:57 pm, Vladimir Savic wrote:
> Could you try to make glowing more intensive. Perhaps, opacity knocked at
> 75-80%?! That will not effect lighter backgrounds, but will help seeing
> icons on darker. Would you like some help? Maybe toolbar or two? :)
I had it at 50% origina
On Monday 23 May 2005 02:21 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> The halo-ing looks about right, although it's not of constant visual
> thickness -- the thicker halo to left of the note head (for example)
Yeah, I know. :( I was rather hoping to sneak that by. :)
I guess I'm going to have to start with a
On Mon, 23 May 2005 03:17:46 +0200, Silvan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought I'd get opinions before I do any more of these. It's a
time-consuming business.
Comments? I'm away until Tuesday. If I get a green light on these I'll
try
to spend this week redoing all of these umpty scadil
On Monday 23 May 2005 02:17, Silvan wrote:
> Comments?
The halo-ing looks about right, although it's not of constant visual
thickness -- the thicker halo to left of the note head (for example)
makes it look a little irregular. I'd like to see the original .png of
just the icon in order to chec
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:17:46PM -0400, Silvan wrote:
> I thought I'd get opinions before I do any more of these. It's a
> time-consuming business.
What are the differences I'm looking for? It, uh, looks like a note!
Ross
---
This SF.Net
I thought I'd get opinions before I do any more of these. It's a
time-consuming business.
Comments? I'm away until Tuesday. If I get a green light on these I'll try
to spend this week redoing all of these umpty scadillion icons. It's going
to take awhile, and I don't want to do them twice.
11 matches
Mail list logo
