Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-11 Thread Guillaume Laurent
On Friday 11 July 2003 05:44, Silvan wrote: > On Sunday 06 July 2003 02:51 am, Silvan wrote: > > Wow, this SF mail alias sucks. It's almost July 11, and I just got this. > > Or maybe this SF mailing list sucks. Did it just now show up for the rest > of you? I did. But the sf mail alias does suck

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-10 Thread Silvan
On Sunday 06 July 2003 02:51 am, Silvan wrote: Wow, this SF mail alias sucks. It's almost July 11, and I just got this. Or maybe this SF mailing list sucks. Did it just now show up for the rest of you? -- Michael McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek;

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-06 Thread Silvan
On Saturday 05 July 2003 03:10 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > logical thing to do might be to create two segments on the same track > (on top of one another) when you record thus, but I think that'd > probably just cause confusion in practice. I don't think so. Especially not if we come up with some

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-06 Thread Silvan
On Saturday 05 July 2003 11:47 am, Richard Bown wrote: > > Shit, damn, fuck, snot, 29 assholes tied in a knot! > > Right again but it's a "known problem" - at least by me. So I'm not so > worried about it short term. No, I meant that more like "I thought I had this piece of shit keyboard config

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-05 Thread Chris Cannam
On Saturday 05 July 2003 15:11, Silvan wrote: > In Cakewalk, I just had to filter out everything except the channel I > wanted, but Rosegarden uses a one track, one channel model, so it > just takes the extra channel 3 events and lumps them in together. I > don't think there's any distinguishing c

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-05 Thread Richard Bown
On Saturday 05 July 2003 3:11 pm, Silvan wrote: > Incidentally, with one segment set to loop via this marker/loop > mechanism vs. the same segment set to repeat, there's a very obvious > difference. In the latter case, I can't hear the break at all, but > in the former, it feels like there's a mi

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-05 Thread Silvan
On Saturday 05 July 2003 03:25 am, Richard Bown wrote: > I'm currently working on markers to make this all a bit more > obvious. Incidentally, with one segment set to loop via this marker/loop mechanism vs. the same segment set to repeat, there's a very obvious difference. In the latter case,

[Rosegarden-devel] transport loop button...

2003-07-04 Thread Silvan
Looks like this should work, but it doesn't. Now that I think about it, I've never used it before. What's it actually supposed to do, anyway? I've got a drum pattern that I'm jamming along with, and I keep having to rewind the transport, and it's screwing up my groove. So I was thinking about