Regarding dynamic selection of portrait/landscape layouts within the
parameter boxes, I still need to think some more about exactly how to
handle this (unless somebody else gets there first). However, the
following is what comes to mind right now:
My aim is to find an approach that delegates the j
On Saturday 01 July 2006 12:51 am, you wrote:
> resizing the Rosegarden window vertically, you should see the unused
> space at the bottom of the Segment Paremeters box shrink, to make way
> for the Instrument Parameters box.
Indeed it does. Not bad. It was a knee-jerk reaction.
> older behavi
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 7:02 am, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> The "classic" style isn't so classic. The SPB takes up dramatically more
> space than it should, and the IPB doesn't have much room.
What I imagine that you are seeing, is that t
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> Applied and compiled fine, and I like how you solved the problem. Thank you
> very much. I've committed your work to trunk (revision #7325).
Thanks.
Martin
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff do
On Thursday 29 June 2006 7:02 am, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> At the moment, the result doesn't offer any improvements in
> real-estate used, but it's a start.
Now that I've actually seen the results...
The "classic" style isn't so classic. The SPB takes up dramatically more
space than it should,
On Friday, 30 June 2006 23:31, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> Uh, Pedro already did, apparently.
You was not quick enough. Too much water?
> Have fun in Chile.
Happy trip, Martin.
Regards,
Pedro
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done qu
On Friday, 30 June 2006 22:05, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> I have now regenerated the patch, and this time really
> done an "svn diff gui", from the top-level rosegarden directory. The
> result is attached.
>
> Martin
Applied and compiled fine, and I like how you solved the problem. Thank you
very m
On Friday 30 June 2006 5:26 pm, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 4:05 pm, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> > Sorry about that. I previously sent it inline, because I didn't know
>
> OK, that one applied. I'll build it, and if it doesn't break anything,
> commit it.
Uh, Pedro a
On Friday 30 June 2006 4:05 pm, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> Sorry about that. I previously sent it inline, because I didn't know
OK, that one applied. I'll build it, and if it doesn't break anything, commit
it.
--
D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
It fails here too. Martin: Can you send your patch again, this time as an
attachement, please?
Sorry about that. I previously sent it inline, because I didn't know
whether an attachment would make it into the mailing-list archive.
Anyway, I ha
On Friday, 30 June 2006 17:16, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote:
> On Thursday 29 June 2006 7:02 am, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> > The following patch was the output of 'svn diff gui', after I updated
> > my copy of the rosegarden code with the trunk, and resolved the one
> > resulting conflict. Not
On Thursday 29 June 2006 7:02 am, Martin Shepherd wrote:
> The following patch was the output of 'svn diff gui', after I updated
> my copy of the rosegarden code with the trunk, and resolved the one
> resulting conflict. Note that along with changes to existing files,
> this patch also includes two
12 matches
Mail list logo
