On Monday 26 September 2005 02:28 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> The text on white boxes should almost by definition be more legible than
> pretty much any other arrangement. The problem is that it obscures the
> background too much: I find the new (STG) scheme a better compromise.
I do too, overall.
On Sunday 25 Sep 2005 20:06, Silvan wrote:
> Looks like it is. Good, yet... Hrm. First two files I looked at
> are decidedly less legible now, sitting at my usual distance from the
> screen. The white boxes were ugly, but more legible.
The text on white boxes should almost by definition be more
On Sunday 25 September 2005 12:57 pm, Silvan wrote:
> Haven't built it but if it looks just the same as STG then it's a Good
> Thing (tm). I tried to merge that across a long bit back myself, but it
> was more complicated than I had time for, and I forgot all about it.
Looks like it is. Good, y
On Sunday 25 September 2005 09:38 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
> I've just brought across from the STG branch a revised bit of code for
> drawing segment labels without the white background rectangle. It's in
> CVS HEAD now.
>
> I generally prefer it this way; what do others think?
>
> (The code with t
