On 10/11/21 11:33 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
Wrt BGPSec.. I am actually very happy to see that so many people are in favor of
supporting it. I hope that router vendors are watching. To the best of my
knowledge
BGPSec has only been implemented in Bird and Quagga. The main value of
supporting
BGP
On 12/16/19 1:28 PM, Marco Paesani wrote:
> the route 170.79.184.0/22 is not present on
> validator.
well, I see it as present and valid:
ASN PrefixMaximum LengthTrust Anchor
53135 170.79.184.0/22 24LACNIC RPKI Root
--
antonio
signature.asc
Des
On 10/31/19 3:28 PM, Petrit Hasani wrote:
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-08, "RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and
> Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space"
> is now available for discussion.
Hi,
I'm not supporting this policy at this time mainly because the work by
RIPE NCC needed to implement it is no
