Re: Bas64 encoding performance

2002-03-09 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 3/9/02 6:23 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to nominate John for commit access. > > +1 -0 I would like to see some patches first. -jon

Re: Bas64 encoding performance

2002-03-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 15:58, John Wilson wrote: > I have been looking at the performance of the latest version of the Apache > XML-RPC system when transferring 1Mb byte arrays via base64 encoding. That > is to say I have been running the TestBase64 benchmark. > > On my test system (Sun 1.3 JVM on

Re: Bas64 encoding performance

2002-03-09 Thread Rick Blair
John, Looks good. I would like to have them, Any change getting it patched in the apache surce tree. If so then +1. Rick At 08:58 PM 3/9/02 -, you wrote: >I have been looking at the performance of the latest version of the Apache >XML-RPC system when transferring 1Mb byte arrays

Re: Bas64 encoding performance

2002-03-09 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
> Are you interested in having these patches? Twist my arm. -jon

Re: Bas64 encoding performance

2002-03-09 Thread John Wilson
Sorry, I intended to attach the patch to the last message - here it is. John Wilson The Wilson Partnership http://www.wilson.co.uk

Bas64 encoding performance

2002-03-09 Thread John Wilson
I have been looking at the performance of the latest version of the Apache XML-RPC system when transferring 1Mb byte arrays via base64 encoding. That is to say I have been running the TestBase64 benchmark. On my test system (Sun 1.3 JVM on Win2K) here the "old Helma" XML-RPC system runs the TestB

Re: XML-RPC and HTTP

2002-03-09 Thread John Wilson
There have certainly been SMTP implementations which use the XML-RPC message format. There's a Jabber protocol which uses the format too (http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0009.html). John Wilson The Wilson Partnership http://www.wilson.co.uk - Original Message - From: "Ryan Hoegg" <[EMAIL P