On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 22:39, Michael Guymon wrote:
>
> > IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> > If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
>
>
> Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and i
> IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type
(unless I am wrong, which ha
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:55, Michael Guymon wrote:
> hola,
>
>
> I pulled the latest greatest build from CVS for xml-rpc and built the
> example. Using the package org.apache.xmlrpc.WebServer for the server
> and org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient for the client, it worked fine. The
> method call to
hola,
I pulled the latest greatest build from CVS for xml-rpc and built the
example. Using the package org.apache.xmlrpc.WebServer for the server
and org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient for the client, it worked fine. The
method call to 'hello.sayHello' was fine.
My problems started when I used a tc
> WE had this problem as well, and we didn't even bother to subclass, we just
> changed the word protected to public and let it be.
Yep - thought about that myself, but wanted to run on a "vanilla" XML/RPC
version without custom mods. Using a subclass let me do this.
> But I do think there ough
WE had this problem as well, and we didn't even bother to subclass, we just
changed the word protected to public and let it be.
But I do think there ought to at least be a "get port" method in the
baseclass
-Original Message-
From: Rob Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May
> We are doing something similar.
> What I really want is a no-arg constructor
> so that I can setup a port and socket factory
> in a derived class before the base class constructor
> initialiases the web server.
>
Sounds cool - our needs are much more basic than this, but no harm in having
mo
We are doing something similar.
What I really want is a no-arg constructor
so that I can setup a port and socket factory
in a derived class before the base class constructor
initialiases the web server.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Rob Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 200
Part of our app. creates a "callback" web server, for receiving asynchronous
event notification.
I'd like to have the WebServer class pick a dynamic port for me, and from what I
can see if a pass a port number of "0" into the constructor it will do this. Snag is,
the serverSocket field is a pr
