cvs commit: xml-rpc build.xml

2003-01-25 Thread rhoegg
rhoegg 2003/01/25 18:38:27 Modified:.build.xml Log: Modified the test target so that it doesn't try to run the abstract base classes for the tests. Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +3 -1 xml-rpc/build.xml Index: build.xml ==

cvs commit: xml-rpc/xdocs changes.xml

2003-01-25 Thread rhoegg
rhoegg 2003/01/25 18:35:35 Modified:xdocschanges.xml Log: Added changelog entry for today's test work. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +14 -0 xml-rpc/xdocs/changes.xml Index: changes.xml ===

cvs commit: xml-rpc/src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc LiteXmlRpcTransportTest.java LocalServerRpcTest.java XmlRpcTransportTest.java ClientServerRpcTest.java

2003-01-25 Thread rhoegg
rhoegg 2003/01/25 18:31:08 Modified:src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc ClientServerRpcTest.java Added: src/test/org/apache/xmlrpc LiteXmlRpcTransportTest.java LocalServerRpcTest.java XmlRpcTransportTest.java Log: - Created abstract base class LocalServerRpcTe

Re: Logging API

2003-01-25 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Redwood wrote: I would like to have the system property as it allows the XML-RPC library to be debugged at the end-user site without the embedding application having to do anything. The case I had yesterday, I hadn't embedded any specific debugging code and I wanted to use the XML-RPC library deb

Re: Logging API

2003-01-25 Thread Redwood
- Original Message - From: "Ryan Hoegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:13 PM Subject: Re: Logging API > Making a new thread, this was buried in the replies to a Bugzilla > message. :) Yeah, I tend to reply to an old message from the list sinc

cvs commit: xml-rpc/xdocs server.xml

2003-01-25 Thread rhoegg
rhoegg 2003/01/23 17:45:29 Modified:xdocsserver.xml Log: PR:16343 Fixed documentation error as reported in Bugzilla. Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -1 xml-rpc/xdocs/server.xml Index: server.xml =