Re: Apache e-mail

2003-01-27 Thread Daniel Rall
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > Couple of questions related to my apache.org account: > > Am I receiving e-mail there? If so, can I access it with POP or IMAP? How? Yes, the account exists. ASF's icarus and daedalus boxes already have enough load on them that it's best not to use POP

Re: Authentication: Whose responsibility?

2003-01-27 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Andrew Evers wrote: But I think we should revisit authentication now that we have abstracted the transport from the XML-RPC client. As I go through implementing (cleanly) my new XmlRpcTransport, I took a look at the authentication piece of DefaultXmlRpcTransport and LiteXmlRpcTransport. It isn'

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16450] New: - Patch to allow protocol://user:password@host.domain.tld urls to be supplied to XmlRpcClient

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Authentication: Whose responsibility?

2003-01-27 Thread Andrew Evers
> But I think we should revisit authentication now that we have abstracted > the transport from the XML-RPC client. As I go through implementing > (cleanly) my new XmlRpcTransport, I took a look at the authentication > piece of DefaultXmlRpcTransport and LiteXmlRpcTransport. > > It isn't there! W

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9931] - Base64 decoder chokes on a whitespace: FASTER?

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug