[VOTE] new XML-RPC mailing list names

2003-01-30 Thread Daya Krishan Dubey
+1

Re: [VOTE] new XML-RPC mailing list names

2003-01-30 Thread Martin Poeschl
Daniel Rall wrote: As XML-RPC is moving to the new Web Services project, its mailing list names are going to change slightly. Please specify your preference for either of the naming schemes below (or suggest a new scheme if you've thought up something better): [+1] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Martin Poeschl
Ryan Hoegg wrote: While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? Please vote on the following release plans as follows: +1 = In favor 0 = Don't care -1 = Against it Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. Plan 1:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9931] - Base64 decoder chokes on a whitespace

2003-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9931] - Base64 decoder chokes on a whitespace

2003-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13168] - Unexpected XML parser behavior

2003-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13168] - Unexpected XML parser behavior

2003-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13168] - Unexpected XML parser behavior

2003-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9931] - Base64 decoder chokes on a whitespace

2003-01-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Daniel Rall wrote: Is it the 1.2 branch which needs the base-64 fixes backported into it? I'm all for improving the performance, but I wouldn't hold up a release on account of it. Agreed, we need to put what we have into the 1.2 branch (once the voting is officially over). I will port the f

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Daniel Rall
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > Daniel Rall wrote: > > >p.s. Did the base-64 fixes make it into both 1.2 branch _and_ HEAD? > > Not yet. I think the issue is basically closed except for some > uncertainty on performance with large inputs. I was going to get around > to making a test

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Martin Redington
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 09:47 PM, Ryan Hoegg wrote: Daniel Rall wrote: p.s. Did the base-64 fixes make it into both 1.2 branch _and_ HEAD? Not yet. I think the issue is basically closed except for some uncertainty on performance with large inputs. There's a new comment added to

Re: [VOTE] new XML-RPC mailing list names

2003-01-30 Thread John Wilson
- Original Message - From: "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:51 PM Subject: [VOTE] new XML-RPC mailing list names > As XML-RPC is moving to the new Web Services project, its mailing list names > are going to change slightly. Ple

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread John Wilson
+1 Plan 1 It's been too long since the last release. Users are being directed to the CVS version too often (and too often the don't have the knowledge to make use of the CVS version). John Wilson The Wilson Partnership http://www.wilson.co.uk - Original Message - From: "Ryan Hoegg" <[EMA

Re: [VOTE] new XML-RPC mailing list names

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Daniel Rall wrote: As XML-RPC is moving to the new Web Services project, its mailing list names are going to change slightly. Please specify your preference for either of the naming schemes below (or suggest a new scheme if you've thought up something better): [+1] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Daniel Rall wrote: p.s. Did the base-64 fixes make it into both 1.2 branch _and_ HEAD? Not yet. I think the issue is basically closed except for some uncertainty on performance with large inputs. I was going to get around to making a test for that this weekend. I found a tasty Project Gu

[VOTE] new XML-RPC mailing list names

2003-01-30 Thread Daniel Rall
As XML-RPC is moving to the new Web Services project, its mailing list names are going to change slightly. Please specify your preference for either of the naming schemes below (or suggest a new scheme if you've thought up something better): [ ] [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] [EMA

Re: [VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Daniel Rall
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ryan Hoegg wrote: > While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? > > Please vote on the following release plans as follows: > > +1 = In favor > 0 = Don't care > -1 = Against it > > Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. Any -1 votes must be acc

[VOTE] Release plan

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
While we are making changes, why not vote on the release plan? Please vote on the following release plans as follows: +1 = In favor 0 = Don't care -1 = Against it Feel free to comment on why you voted as you did. Plan 1: Go forward with a 1.

Re: Mailing lists for Web Services Projects (fwd)

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
No preference, and it looks as though they are going forward with xmlrpc. Should we have a quick [VOTE]? Daniel Rall wrote: What are people's thoughts on the list names? I think I saw Ryan change the Maven project descriptor recently in this regard. I like Sam's suggestion of either xmlrpc-

Re: Mailing lists for Web Services Projects (fwd)

2003-01-30 Thread Daniel Rall
What are people's thoughts on the list names? I think I saw Ryan change the Maven project descriptor recently in this regard. I like Sam's suggestion of either xmlrpc-[list] or xml-rpc-[list] @ws.apache.org, but don't have a strong preference between the two. If pressed, I'd likely choose th

Re: cvs commit: xml-rpc/xdocs/images project-logo.jpg

2003-01-30 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Hi Martin or whoever does the Maven push. Please don't actually publish the web site from the current content until February 1, because Davanum is still finishing the ws.apaceh.org site. -- Ryan Hoegg ISIS Networks http://www.isisnetworks.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mpoeschl2003/01/30 05

cvs commit: xml-rpc/xdocs/images project-logo.jpg

2003-01-30 Thread mpoeschl
mpoeschl2003/01/30 05:57:14 Modified:.project.xml project.properties Added: xdocs/images project-logo.jpg Log: o add ws logo o display version info Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +2 -2 xml-rpc/project.xml Index: project.xml ==