- Original Message -
[snip]
> why is MinML in the xml-rpc repo??
>
Because it is the default XML parser for Apache XML-RPC.
> the MinML version is 1.6 .. there is a 1.7 version available ..
> what's the difference?
> should we upgrade?
The 1.7 version contains nothing new of relevance
John Wilson wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [vote] coding conventions
>
>
>
>>on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, &quo
on 3/14/02 11:43 AM, "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
> obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
> class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
> have no w
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] coding conventions
> on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&
on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for the Sun conventions.
Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
follow in your own code). :-)
-jon
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Poeschl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:55 AM
Subject: [vote] coding conventions
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but
first we have to decide
Martin Poeschl wrote:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project,
> but first we have to decide which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
Martin Poeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project,
> but first we have to decide which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
>(http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code
on 3/13/02 6:06 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for turbine
>
+1 for turbine
-jon
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 20:55, Martin Poeschl wrote:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but first we
>have to decide
> which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
>(http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but first we have
to decide
which code conventions we should use ...
i think there are 2 options:
* turbine code conventions
(http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
* sun code conventions (http://java
11 matches
Mail list logo
