> Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type
> (unless I am wrong, which happens once in a while).
The spec says "If no type is indicated, the type is string."
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 22:39, Michael Guymon wrote:
>
> > IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> > If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
>
>
> Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
> http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and i
> IIRC, the spec says that you don't have to include ...
> If there is no type tag after value, it is assumed that it is a string.
Ok that makes sense. I re-read the specification at
http://www.xmlrpc.com/spec and it did not mention a default tag type
(unless I am wrong, which ha
On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 14:55, Michael Guymon wrote:
> hola,
>
>
> I pulled the latest greatest build from CVS for xml-rpc and built the
> example. Using the package org.apache.xmlrpc.WebServer for the server
> and org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient for the client, it worked fine. The
> method call to
