anks,
Karl
-Original Message-
From: Steve Quint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Status of apache xmlrpc
At 1:23 PM -0800 2/3/05, Daniel Rall wrote:
>I believe it's available from CVS HEAD, but haven't loo
At 1:23 PM -0800 2/3/05, Daniel Rall wrote:
I believe it's available from CVS HEAD, but haven't looked recently.
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 15:43 -0500, Martino, Karl wrote:
Hello Steve,
That class is not part of the current release. Is there a place I can
> download the build you mention? Is it pr
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Quint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 2:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Status of apache xmlrpc
>
>
> At 3:51 PM -0500 1/21/05, Martino, Karl wrote:
]
Subject: RE: Status of apache xmlrpc
At 3:51 PM -0500 1/21/05, Martino, Karl wrote:
>Is there a build out there that utilizes HttpClient?
The existing build already supports it. If you must use commons
httpclient, look at the class
org.apache.xmlrpc.CommonsXmlRpcTransport.
--
St
This isn't in the current release. When you say "build" do you mean a
checkout of what's in CVS?
Thanks,
Karl
-Original Message-
From: Steve Quint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 2:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Status of apa
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Status of apache xmlrpc
At 3:51 PM -0500 1/21/05, Martino, Karl wrote:
>Is there a build out there that utilizes HttpClient?
The existing build already supports it. If you must use commons
httpclient, look at the class
org.apache.xmlrpc.CommonsXmlRpcT
At 3:51 PM -0500 1/21/05, Martino, Karl wrote:
Is there a build out there that utilizes HttpClient?
The existing build already supports it. If you must use commons
httpclient, look at the class
org.apache.xmlrpc.CommonsXmlRpcTransport.
--
Steve
--
Is there a build out there that utilizes HttpClient?
Karl
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Status of apache xmlrpc
Thomas Smallwood wrote:
> My next question will proba
Thomas Smallwood wrote:
My next question will probably result in subjective responses but I'll
ask it anyway: Is XML-RPC still a viable/reasonable solution for
client/server communication or has it been replaced by something new and
better?
I don't like it, as it is. But with some additional patche
tds
Phone: 303.442.3813 x577
Fax: 303.442.3846
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Status of apache xmlrpc
>
> Thomas Smallwood w
Will there be a migration to use Apache's own HttpClient for communications?
Thanks,
karl
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 4:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Status of apache xmlrpc
Thomas Smallwood
Thomas Smallwood wrote:
Sorry to bother anybody, but would somebody be able to tell me the
status of the xmlrpc project. Is it on-going and alive or has it ground
to a halt with no further development likely?
As the XML-RPC spec won't change and the committers have (AFAIK) refused
anything, that
Sorry to bother anybody, but would somebody be able to tell
me the status of the xmlrpc project. Is it on-going and alive or has it ground
to a halt with no further development likely?
Phone:
303.442.3813 x577
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo