Daniel,
My compiler gives me an error saying that the method isn't defined. So I =
guess it hasn't been implemented.
Thanks all the same.
Udupa
-Original Message-
From: Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 12/11/2004 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:=09
Subject:Re
Hi,
I'm not an expert but I believe the provider should have implemented that
method so try calling it to get the cert info.
Regards,
Daniel
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Ranganath Udupa wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build a secure peer to peer shell program that can talk to each
> other using xm
Right. Since the byte[] wasn't human readable anyway, I went ahead and added
the gzip support.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Arnott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone know a filter I can use to prevent this?
Karnes,
Karnes, Derek wrote:
John,
We had a problem with certain data not being xml-rpc compliant, and got around
it by gzipping the data. The gzipped data is XML-RPC compliant, and in our case,
the compression helped transfer rates since the data was large enough to justify
the compression/decompressio
John,
We had a problem with certain data not being xml-rpc compliant, and got around
it by gzipping the data. The gzipped data is XML-RPC compliant, and in our
case, the compression helped transfer rates since the data was large enough to
justify the compression/decompression time.
Just an idea,
Hi,
I am trying to build a secure peer to peer shell program that can talk to each
other using xml-rpc. Each peer is can interact with only a valid set of
peers...and validation of peers is done using an identity certificate (x.509v3
based). I have been able to establish a secure xml-rpc calls a
