Well I am working on it in my spare time, but I see no reason it would
take more than a month.
Just checked the code; yes, the SecureXmlRpcClient code has the same
limitations.
Ryan Hoegg
John Perrotto wrote:
>Thanks for the info Ryan. Does the same hold true for the
>SecureXmlRpcClient not
Thanks for the info Ryan. Does the same hold true for the
SecureXmlRpcClient not supporting advanced HTTP features? Do you have a
ballpark date for a new release with extended HTTP features?
-Regards...John Perrotto
Ryan Hoegg wrote:
> Currently, the XmlRpcClient and XmlRpcClientLite use a
Currently, the XmlRpcClient and XmlRpcClientLite use a simple
implementation of an http client. This implementation does not support
many extended HTTP features. I am currently working on a change to the
code that will enable this functionality, so possibly look for it in a
future release!
Hi All,
I'm using an HttpServlet to host my XmlRpcServer. I want to enable the
HTTP keep-alive feature between my client and server apps. I've called
the method XmlRpc.setKeepAlive(true) on the server and client-side. My
Java client is using the
org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient.SecureXmlRpcClien
