gt; > It would be helpful if the xmlrpc package supported logging via log4j rather
>then printing to System.err ...
>> >>
>> >> thoughts?
>> >
>> > If anything we should probably think about moving towards using the
>> > commons logging pac
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 14:44, Daniel Rall wrote:
> [moving discussion to dev list]
>
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 16:28, Miguel DeAvila wrote:
> > > It would be helpful if the xmlrpc package supported logging vi
Encapsulating logging for XML-RPC is more than a good idea, if for no other
reason than for performance and stability (try fixing a production console
java app only to find that the operator hit ctrl-S).
I agree that XML-RPC should support the overiding of a logging method with
the current
[moving discussion to dev list]
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 16:28, Miguel DeAvila wrote:
> > It would be helpful if the xmlrpc package supported logging via log4j rather then
>printing to System.err ...
>>
>> thoughts?
>
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 16:28, Miguel DeAvila wrote:
> It would be helpful if the xmlrpc package supported logging via log4j rather then
>printing to System.err ...
>
> thoughts?
If anything we should probably think about moving towards using the
commons logging package.
>
It would be helpful if the xmlrpc package supported
logging via log4j rather then printing to System.err ...
thoughts?
Miguel DeAvila
