On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:05 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
>
> Done : lzip and lrzip support are in HEAD and in the 5_4 Branch. Tomorrow i
> will
> search if there are some my patch that live only in HEAD and i will merge in
> 5_4 as well.
> Best Regards
>
BTW, the buildbot master is now running at
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Could you push all these changes back to the rpm-5_4 branch
> too please? That's where the buildbot's are running, and
> I am active.
>
> Otherwise these changes are gonna reside on HEAD until
> a ROADMAP or participation exists, and that isn'
Could you push all these changes back to the rpm-5_4 branch
too please? That's where the buildbot's are running, and
I am active.
Otherwise these changes are gonna reside on HEAD until
a ROADMAP or participation exists, and that isn't likely
soon.
Thanks!
73 de Jeff
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:41 AM,
Instead of adding sparkly rubt gem's, you ought to teach
%setup to unpack from *.src.rpm's by adding a rpm2cpio layer and
recursing through the unpacked %prep in the *.spec.
The other approach is with rpm -q --yaml onto the *.src.rpm, one
would need to expand the %setup there. But --yaml "works" o
Jeff Johnson wrote:
It sure would be nice to have %patch as a macro rather
than flip-flopping and jiggering up Yet More Complicated
Silly Stuff, all forcing rpm rpm be recompiled.
The change was supposed to be to macros (and %patch)...
I haven't a clue anymore (because of the number of flip-
It sure would be nice to have %patch as a macro rather
than flip-flopping and jiggering up Yet More Complicated
Silly Stuff, all forcing rpm rpm be recompiled.
I haven't a clue anymore (because of the number of flip-flops)
how patches are applied by rpmbuild.
Can the
#ifndef DYING
sectio
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Fussing with --fuzz opens up a world of pain and voids the warranty
of %patch macros.
Right, so that's why I left the default as "-1" (which translates to 2)
rather than changing the default to the stricter "0" as done elsewhere.
If you want pain, try
#%patchN
in spec
Fussing with --fuzz opens up a world of pain and voids the warranty of
%patch macros.
If you want pain, try
#%patchN
in spec files.
I'm unable to convince myself that burying New Fangled Secret Sauce
Switches internally
to the rpmbuild parser is in anyone's interest whatsoever.
There c
On Thursday, 21 June 2007, at 12:56:21 (-0500),
Mark Hatle wrote:
> Apply the patch isn't the problem. :) It's changing the sources and
> generating new patches without the user ever having to go to the command
> line thats the issue. (Unfortunately there are folks who haven't
> figured out how
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> While there's nothing wrong withe your patch, there's simply
> no reason not to just pass *all* patch options directly to
> patch. That dumps a bunch of silly code from rpmbuild.
>
> The reason for the parsePrep.c jiggery pokery is transparently remappin
While there's nothing wrong withe your patch, there's simply
no reason not to just pass *all* patch options directly to
patch. That dumps a bunch of silly code from rpmbuild.
The reason for the parsePrep.c jiggery pokery is transparently remapping
ancient patch's CLI option change that was encode
Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>
>> This brings up something we've discussed here at Wind River. Would it
>> be possible to make %setup and/or %patch into macros (perhaps using
>> lua?) (I'm thinking for rpm5 - HEAD, not 4_5.)
>>
>
> Why ask for a buttl
On Jun 21, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
This brings up something we've discussed here at Wind River. Would it
be possible to make %setup and/or %patch into macros (perhaps using
lua?) (I'm thinking for rpm5 - HEAD, not 4_5.)
Why ask for a buttload of legacy pain? Just use names oth
This brings up something we've discussed here at Wind River. Would it
be possible to make %setup and/or %patch into macros (perhaps using
lua?) (I'm thinking for rpm5 - HEAD, not 4_5.)
The reason we're interested is that we have mechanisms that track
patches being applied (think quilt), and woul
14 matches
Mail list logo
