Re: Distepoch & "identification" (was Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/ transaction.c)

2011-07-13 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
2011/7/12 Jeff Johnson : > Lemme split this into 2 threads to try to address > two twisted issues properly. The other thread will be >        Transaction sanity checks > > On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > You need to figure a better *RE pattern, not whack in lots of

Distepoch & "identification" (was Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm/ CHANGES rpm/lib/ transaction.c)

2011-07-12 Thread Jeff Johnson
Lemme split this into 2 threads to try to address two twisted issues properly. The other thread will be Transaction sanity checks On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> >>> You need to figure a better *RE pattern, not whack in >>> lots of gunky code to "fix it somehow". >>