On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:44:06PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >>So I'm a bit concerned that adding "...evl" (or ...evb) is going to
> >>be confusing in the name.
> >>
> >>What we have done is called it armv5el_vfp.
> >
> >I've considered that, but that breaks configure scripts that match
> >agains
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
(please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@)
The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if
the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building
and using VFP-optimised RPM
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > (please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@)
> >
> > The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if
> > the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building
> > and using VFP-optimised RPM package
Dear all,
I would like to build rpm and all dependencies from source, version 4.4.2.x
Could you please indicate which are the minimal requirements to build
the library?
I would like to understand what operations one 'loose' building the
library without the openssl/libcrypto,
Thank you for your he
Dear Mark,
thank you again for your explanation, I will have a look at the sources,
pazzodalegare
2008/1/11, Mark Hatle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is a bit that is set by the rpm package that controls various
> aspects of validation.
>
> md5sum, attributes, size, "ghost" (if it may or may not
