On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 08:23:40PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> Having said that, the current behaviour seems to be quite broken.
> Please explain the following:
>
> Provides: foo > 1.2-1
> Requires: foo = 1.2 no match
>
> Provides: foo >= 1.2-1
> Requires: foo = 1.2
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 18:11 +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 08:23:40PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > Having said that, the current behaviour seems to be quite broken.
> > Please explain the following:
> >
> > Provides: foo > 1.2-1
> > Requires: foo = 1.2
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:44:53AM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> - tilde support in version comparison
> - triggers on provides instead of package names
> - weak dependencies (basically just parsing them and storing them
> in the rpm header)
> - defining some tag where yum/zypp/smart can stor
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:10:25PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by explain ... I assume you know why it's
> doing what it's doing, so I guess you are saying "explain why we would
> want it to do that"?
>
> To which I'd say, why would we want it to match on:
>
> Provid
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:26:49PM +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:10:25PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> > ...before rpm even sees it. Does that still change?
>
> Uh, you're confusing me. "Provides: foo > 1.2, Requires foo = 1.2"
> does not match, both with and without
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:26 +0100, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:10:25PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by explain ... I assume you know why it's
> > doing what it's doing, so I guess you are saying "explain why we would
> > want it to do that"?
>
