On 04/09/2013 11:40 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:32:57AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
I suppose the idea has been not to complain when its "known broken", ie
installed with --replacefiles or --force. The kinda legitimate use-case for
that would be replacing %config fi
On 04/09/2013 11:57 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:40:42AM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
Yes, that would work for me. Another easy bandaid is to add an option
to make verify report bad replaced files.
Speaking of new options, do you mind adding a new "--noposttrans"
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:40:42AM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> Yes, that would work for me. Another easy bandaid is to add an option
> to make verify report bad replaced files.
Speaking of new options, do you mind adding a new "--noposttrans" option
that makes rpm not execute the posttrans s
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:32:57AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> I suppose the idea has been not to complain when its "known broken", ie
> installed with --replacefiles or --force. The kinda legitimate use-case for
> that would be replacing %config files from another package, for everything
>
