Closed #750.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/750#event-2412598169___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Starting with rpm 4.14.2, yes. See https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.14.2
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Is there a way to force rpm -i or -U to fail if rpm is not signed with gpg key?
if not how to enable it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
If the code committed? if not, is there a patch available?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #749 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/749#event-2410030073___
Rpm-maint mailing list
ignatenkobrain approved this pull request.
Oh yeah :)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -178,13 +179,17 @@ static int dateToTimet(const char * datestr, time_t *
> secs, int * date_words)
if (*secs == -1) goto exit;
+if (tzname[1][0] == 0)
+ rpmlog(RPMLOG_WARNING, _("bogus TZ database name in %%changelog:
%s\n"),
The job killer introduced at 06953879d3e0b1e9a434979056d1225ab4646142
failed to take into account the fact that the processes *can* die between
us grabbing the pids and actually killing them, and that trying to kill
a non-existent process will cause a script running with -e to actually
terminate
We always allocate the index here as should be obvious from the code,
the condition is a leftover that might've been relevant in the turn
of the millenium but not anymore.
This construct confused clang into thinking there's a NULL pointer
dereference at the end of a long callchain (maybe because
Warning instead of info is emitted (in the latest version).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Corrected in the latest version.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/739#issuecomment-501619925___
Rpm-maint mailing
Looks good. Only thing left is a missing "g" in the commit message of 3rd patch.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #747 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/747#event-2409723495___
Rpm-maint mailing list
ignatenkobrain approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
14 matches
Mail list logo
