> Wouldn't this also make sense for `%sourcelist` too?
Yeah - and if you look at the code, it does it for both, I just didn't mention
one in the commit message.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Yeah, I noticed that it still leaks on multiple uses, and there may be better
solutions these days. I chose to stop here for an entirely selfish reason -
using -b twice is clearly wrong to do, with only invoking it once, that leak is
chaff that shows up when I'm running valgrind to check my
PR #880 is the first piece of the puzzle, was easier (and different) from what
I originally thought.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This pops up from time to time as a bug report. The message rpm prints for too
low disk space/too few inodes is a bit confusing:
```
foo.noarch needs 377MB on the /usr/src filesystem
```
But the disk has more than 377 MB free space.
What's meant is that it needs 377 MB *more* disk space. Could
First piece of the puzzle to better support reconstructed payloads (#861)
The actual work is pretty trivial here, but I dont like the name suggested
in the ticket (too long), and I dont much the one used here much better,
hence RFC only at the moment. Uncompressed is such a long annoying
word,
I concur, having special-purpose switch(es) for this seems nicer and way more
obvious than using --nobuild to achieve the same :+1:
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
It does smell like a regression, but then it's not clear whether --nobuild was
ever intended to be used stand-alone. By appearance more like a disabler
similar to --nocheck and --noprep etc, to be used with some other build modes.
Eg 'rpmbuild -bb --nobuild ' does still work for checking
rpmlib() dependencies are an installability barrier, and dynamic
buildrequires do not qualify: the package cannot be correctly *built*
with older rpm versions, but they will simply fail to parse the spec
due to unknown tag. However rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires) as it is
injected by rpm 4.15.0
