Except that, err, nevermind. Checking weak deps is a different patch. Sorry for
the noise.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/605#issuecomment-574537423___
Reopened #605.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/605#event-2949793857___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
While backporting this seems like an obviously good idea on the first sight, it
actually is not:
older rpm versions which do not support rich dependencies also do not look into
weak dependencies in any situation, so they're just unused and harmless. This
patch changes the situation in that all o
Closed #605.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/605#event-2949790205___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.o
Closed #611.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/611#event-2949771982___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.o
With the release of rpm 4.15, 4.13 fell out of support so we won't be making
any new releases on that branch. Thanks for the effort anyway.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-mana
Closed #360.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/360#event-2949768349___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.o
Half a year later, this still isn't going anywhere that I can tell. Lets just
close it with the notion that you'll reopen/submit a new one once you have
something new. Years old PR's aren't good for anybody.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this emai
Without actually looking - alignment, padding?
Why do you care?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1010#issuecomment-574520657
Casting doesn't silence warnings from functions with warn_unused_result
attribute. You need to actually check the value.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/100
I have an RPM file in the attachment:
[dos2unix-7.4.1-1-rosa2019.1.x86_64.rpm.gz](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/files/4060288/dos2unix-7.4.1-1-rosa2019.1.x86_64.rpm.gz)
After addsign the RPMSIGTAG_MD5 has 2 zero bytes added after the hash itself,
which is 16 bytes. What is the rea
Fixes #1008
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1009
-- Commit Summary --
* ndb: fix ftruncate return value warning
-- File Changes --
M lib/backend/ndb/rpmxdb.c (2)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/r
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985#issuecomment-574158812___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.
Thanks for merging it :)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984#issuecomment-574159110___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
Merged #975 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/975#event-2946533841___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint
No objections from anybody, I guess it's good to go.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/975#issuecomment-574112559__
Merged via #1006 . Thanks for the effort of bringing this upstream.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985#issuecomment-574112205___
Closed #985.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985#event-2946530627___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.o
Closed #984.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984#event-2946531080___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.o
Merged via #1006 . Thanks for the effort of bringing this upstream.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984#issuecomment-574112248___
Merged #1006 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1006#event-2946527567___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Merged #1007 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1007#event-2946374651___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Um, sure it's needed with rpmlog(), always unless you actually want the next
log message to be on the same line (which isn't reliable anyway).
Thanks for the patch!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://gi
Starting with commit 49d43a334572199088ecc24ce6fc0e86c8699d2e, I'm getting the
following error:
> backend/ndb/rpmxdb.c: In function ‘rpmxdbDelAllBlobs’:
> backend/ndb/rpmxdb.c:966:5: error: ignoring return value of ‘ftruncate’,
> declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]
24 matches
Mail list logo
