> So for rpmbuild none are installed.
I don't see any practical reason to exit status 11 in such case. That's why I
filled this issue originally.
Since we aren't entirely consistent here, we should document that exit status
11 might be result of the `--nodeps` option.
--
You are receiving th
> > no matter if all build requires are installed
>
> because rpmbuild does not check them because `--nodeps` is specified :) So
> for rpmbuild none are installed.
Which does not necessarily mean that they are *missing*. But yeah, we still
return 11, to "signal" that the deps weren't checked an
This issue stems from the fact that the line continuation marker `\` has
*different* semantics in the spec-level context and in a macro definition. On
the spec level, it is used to break long `%if` statements into multiple lines.
Inside macro definitions, it's the whole body that's broken down.
