@vt-alt pushed 1 commit.
8ab1e3646607711c81860998bdf49cc2ffe81fdd debugedit: Distinguish files from
directories in src list file
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1436/files/01dee60d8dd1f
@vt-alt pushed 1 commit.
3e2cf02947c2048df90cf9161bfa8a7df60d4061 debugedit: Do not 'edit_dwarf2' when
just extracting build-id
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1435/files/d47fece7584778
Indeed it is, but not being able to write `quote_array` is somewhat concerning,
especially since `\x1a` is technically a valid character in filenames.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-so
Been thinking about this on and off, and it still rubs me the wrong way. The
spec is a convoluted mess as it is, and even the experienced packagers and
macro developers have difficulties understanding and remembering the different
time and space contexts of macros and build scriptlets which sit
Hi,
This looks OK. I added a description of which functions were separate
from where to the commit message and rebased the commit to the master
branch.
Cheers,
Mark
From ca137a2fa64eacfd0ad42b89c8436d78e1143820 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kratochvil
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:58:19 +0200
Hi,
I don't fully understand what this patch is intended to do. Why is it
necessary?
> commit 0da448c337d481f1c50af212246ceb213a7d80cc (HEAD -> master)
> Author: Jan Kratochvil
> Date: Mon Aug 17 21:46:47 2020 +0200
>
> debugedit: Fix handling in caller for errors in called
> read_dwarf2_
Hi,
The attached patch is part of the proposed patch series for PR/1332 and
looks good. It can be applied independently IMHO.
Cheers,
Mark
From aabd13f513eefe7e7db35a668e650a304def85d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kratochvil
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:56:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] deb
Thank you...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1440#issuecomment-727879588___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@li
Scriptlets are separate processes, basically the only common thing between them
is the parent PID. If you need to share data between scriptlets, you need to
put it on the filesystem.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Closed #1440.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1440#event-3999465778___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
I have to retrieve in the SPEC file the previous installed version of the
package. I'm trying to define this custom macro inside %pre:
```spec
%pre
PREVIOUS_VERSION=$(/path/to/executable --version)
%global _prevver $(echo $PREVIOUS_VERSION)
```
I will use it in the %post phase:
```spec
%post
Rpm macro engine is just a very simple-minded text processor. Handling binary
data is out of scope.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1438#issuecomment-7278
12 matches
Mail list logo
